i'm tired of these lame duck teams who beat up no bodies and then run it all the way to the title game. lame. i'm glad pitt..who's 4-7 by the way..is about to lose..
as for mizzou..same goes for them. they are dormats for freaking 30 something years then suddenly come out of no where..to win..again with a lame duck schedule.
but this season for ncaa ball has been amazing.
but no way in hell does a LSU team with 2 losses or any team with 2 losses belong in a title game. I don't want to hear this crap about winning a title in a conference title game. those games aren't legit. they are simply there for money and nothing more. because you play a title game at the end of league play doesn't make your league better. just means you play one more game. there was a time when teams played each other all season long and who was left standing was the league winner. that's now a real champ is determined. not because the networks worked a deal with a conference to ad a title game.
2007-12-01
14:57:02
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Banned from yahoo 5 times
2
in
Sports
➔ Football (American)
and a loss at HOME
2007-12-01
14:57:38 ·
update #1
i'd put in ohio state because they next in line though they shouldn't be and georgia.
look at it this way. ohio state should have fallen as far as usc did..hell usc even LOST ranking when it beat arizona and asu and a few other teams. so my point is this. you can't move LSU up nor can you justify keeping ohio state, kansas, and a few others in the top 10-to play in a title game when the rules are inconsistant. fact is there are no strenght of schedule considered in the bcs-well a tiiiiiiiiiiny bit yes-but its not a major factor. point being...a few other teams like hawaii and usc get called on this and lose rank. but LSU gets love for a QUALITY LOSS...i'm sorry..but there's no such thing as a quality loss.
LSU and USC both have 2 losses. sorry but the fact is you have to look at it as the same. hell ohio state lost to illinois..and i like that team..but let's be real the illini aren't a top 25 team..so how come ohio state didn't drop out of the top 10 like it should have.
2007-12-01
15:09:58 ·
update #2
LSU and ohio state are only in the upper rankings because the media has been sucking these two teams knobs all year long. logic wouldn't put these two teams in the top ten.
again. there's no such thing as a quality loss. but yet both ohio state AND 2 TIMES NOW..LSU have been given so much love after losing..hell LSU LOST its second game AND DIDN'T EVEN DROP OUT OF THE TOP 10..that's just pathetic..but florida did...come on now.
2007-12-01
15:13:04 ·
update #3
rated r. i love your response. my feeling exactly. now i'm a cal grad so i'm a cal fan. but lets be real. hawaii ran the table..hell put them in. i think they would be able to easily run with ohio state ...maybe not georgia but i do think they'd put points on the board. they won't play any D...but they'll score.
2007-12-01
15:14:57 ·
update #4