http://franciscanconservative.blogspot.com/
2007-12-01 13:30:05 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
If U R Pro-Life here is some 411! Please write to your representative to get this ACT passed now!
Education, Prevention, more Education, Pregnancy Support, and Adoption are the Answers.
http://www.feministsforlife.org/ECS
http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_915.html
(You can read the bill on this site)
S. 915, the Elizabeth Cady Stanton Pregnant and Parenting Student Services Act of 2007
2007-12-01 13:51:25 · update #1
ONLY IF U want to! This is NOT a solititation!
2007-12-01 13:52:34 · update #2
Yes I did and how odd. You rock for the links. Take care. By the way if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it must be a duck.
2007-12-01 14:23:49 · answer #1 · answered by R J 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do Republicans also know he's a skirt-chaser? They hated Clinton for the same thing! Does anybody smell the hypocrisy? It figures that someone who is that much of a womanizer is also in favor of abortion, because that's the way he can cover his mistakes.
And, I agree with an earlier response. If Republicans were serious about abortion, they would have done something about it while they had both houses of Congress, a majority in the Supreme Court, and the Presidency --- for six years!!! They would rather NOT do anything about it and retain it as a wedge issue to win votes.
The comment that Obama didn't become a Christian until he came to the U.S. is silly and intentionally misleading. He actually attended Catholic school before he ever came to the U.S.
2007-12-01 13:52:59 · answer #2 · answered by Dr. WD 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What is all this garbage of a politician being for or against abortion? What difference does this make in running the government ?So long as he is not doing the aborting this statement of pro or con has no business being in politics. It is a crying shame that women have picked up this banner when the criticism should be addressed to the Judicial branch of government not the Executive Branch.
2007-12-01 13:41:19 · answer #3 · answered by googie 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You have to really wonder if they do...Ron Paul is the only one of the candidates who actually put legislation on the table with respect to a Pro-Life position.
The bigger question is why have Evangelicals and Pro-Life supporters turned their back on Ron Paul??
The other boys all talk the talk...but once elected will not walk the walk. I mean really...Bush had the House, the Senate, the Court and made no effort to give Evangelicals what they really expected of him. Instead they got a ridiculous war.
2007-12-01 14:02:08 · answer #4 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ah, it is NOT "PRO abortion, it is pro CHOICE. God you people are ignorant and arrogant...not to mention wrong. We espouse freedom of choice for the woman; it is her body and her decision and no one else has the right to force her to do anything against her will, which is what you people are all about. BTW, how many unwanted children already here have YOU adopted? How many do you volunteer your time to help every week? How much money do you donate on a regular basis for their care? Oh, right, I forgot...you only proselytize when they're still in the womb; once they're born you lose interest...
ANYONE notice the photo of Hillary and Obama when the National Anthem was being played; everyone had their hand over their heart except Obama...his arms were folded across his chest; doesn't seem to think much of the country he wants to run...
2007-12-01 13:35:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yea, as of now he is.. But that might change in a couple months... But really, what they should know is that it does NOT matter.. The current pres claims he is "pro-life" and has done nothing about the issue.. Same with his father.. Nothing.. Same with Reagan.. NOTHING..
If Republicans were gonna do something about abortion, it would've already been done.. This is just a smoke and mirrors issue.. I really question how much they really care..
2007-12-01 13:38:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Some do. Pat Robertson is endorsing him. How about that for ironic? It shows how scared we are for the possibility of Hillery fooling enough people to get elected.
2007-12-01 14:59:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I listened to Giuliani answer this question in a public debate. He did not say he is pro-abortion. He said it is none of the government's business. This makes him one of the very, very few politicians who gets it.
2007-12-01 13:37:40 · answer #8 · answered by Tony 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is one of the main reasons Ann Coulter is against him. She has been quite vocal about it.
If anti-abortion means absolutely no abortion, wouldn't pro-abortion mean absolutely always abortion? Isn't this why people refer to it as pro-choice. Because they are not arguing the morality of abortion, merely who gets to decide the issue...
2007-12-01 13:34:31 · answer #9 · answered by Boom Blatz 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Being "pro" or "anti" abortion is immaterial. He has vowed to nominate constructionist judges.
The President has absolutely no say in abortion outside of this duty - Conservatives would be well-served by Rudy.
2007-12-01 13:37:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋