English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1) Loch Ness Monster
2) The Yeti
3) Bigfoot

Your thoughts?

2007-12-01 12:17:41 · 24 answers · asked by Scooter_loves_his_dad 7 in Society & Culture Mythology & Folklore

24 answers

This Farm girl.......who is not drunk believes there is a very good possibility they do exist.....especially in very remote parts of the world.....who really knows that they don't.....just recently because of modern technology several new species of aquatic animals have been found in the deepest depths of the oceans..
Years ago we did not have the means to go that deep in our oceans & today we can. Sponges can save lives...that was a very recent discovery.....are there things out there that we do not know about...Absolutely.

2007-12-01 14:58:57 · answer #1 · answered by PJ ~88~ FAN 6 · 1 0

Yeti and Bigfoot are one in the same, also called the Sasquatch and Abominable Snow Man.
I don't see why not; if they don't they could have. It's kind of nice to believe there are these creatures unscathed by man. Different species of fish, insects, etc. are being discovered alive and hidden in remote areas all the time. Why not an elusive Loch Ness or Bigfoot?

2007-12-01 20:29:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think they're all possible. The Loch Ness Monster seems the least likely to me. The lake is just so small comparably for there to be no hard evidence, no corpse, no certifiable video or photographic proof. Bigfoot seems less unlikely. I am not that familiar with the legend of the Yeti.

2007-12-01 20:23:22 · answer #3 · answered by Rasputin 5 · 0 0

Loch Ness monster, no. It has been established that the loch ness does not contain enough "food' for this "animal".

As to the Yeti and Bigfoot. Maybe possible. But I really doubt it.

2007-12-01 22:09:14 · answer #4 · answered by punch 7 · 0 0

1) I think the lochness monster is based on tales people used to make up to explain something they thought they saw. such then becomes local myth.
2) and 3) I think they're based loosely off someone possibly stumbling upon mysterious tracks from a large animal and possible have a slim chance of being a real creature that once existed. a possible asnswer is that it's a relative of homo erectus that evolved seperately but soon died out. Such creatures then became part of local myth and became more fiction than fact.

2007-12-01 20:42:17 · answer #5 · answered by skitzofreakishgurl 1 · 0 0

I belive they exist but not like described in the myths the lochness mosnster could be some kind of whale or a dinasour that escaped the cataclyismic event that wiped out the rest of the dinasours and the big foot and the yeti could be some kind of monkey or bear

2007-12-01 20:47:31 · answer #6 · answered by whiteandnerdy 2 · 0 0

For one thing the Yeti and Bigfoot are the same thing just located in different parts of the world and if they exist...... maybe?? but I'm leaning towards no and for the loch ness I don't think so just in your mind

2007-12-01 20:42:01 · answer #7 · answered by Somethin 1 · 0 0

There are hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of species that have not yet been discovered and named. That said, I think it's possible that there are some "Nessies" out there. The same goes for The Yeti/Bigfoot (The Yeti and Bigfoot are the same.) However, some of the "evidence" released "supporting" the existence of these creatures is a joke.

2007-12-01 20:25:58 · answer #8 · answered by <3 2 · 1 0

Fiction to date.

Fact someday.

I lean more believing in Loch Ness.

2007-12-01 21:01:32 · answer #9 · answered by Flo-Jean 2 · 0 0

1.) ..Eh....Depends. Maybe not a monster of lake Loch Ness, but there are animals in the oceans that have not been yet discovered. You never know.
2.) No
3.) Nope

2007-12-01 20:21:35 · answer #10 · answered by Nalawala 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers