Do you think that now Rudy Guliani knows that he cant use 9/11 to score points?

Question

Ok, he did good with 9/11 tragety. He did what he felt needed to be done during such a horrible event. However, that is not something that will win him the Presidential election. I think he knows now that he will have to come with something stronger than that. How about talking less about credentials here, and more about what your plans are should you get elected. I know past behavior tells a lot about the future, but none of these candidates who are running now have ever been President. So looking on the past to judge someones actions on the future dosnt always work. They might get elected and do something diffrent than when they were Mayor, Governor, Senator or Congressmen.

Answer 1

Experience is all you can look at. The rest is promises

Answer 2

maybe, yet Republicans would not have it any incorrect way. there is no longer something the administration must be do, say or demonstrate, be it fact, fiction, effective or ineffective, that should ever fulfill the contest in any way. So what you call scoring 'factors' is somewhat basically cleansing abode placing the organization applicable. that's the pastime of the administrative could do. Be that because it ought to it particularly is the pastime of congress to approve the organization's chief and that they did no longer try this - leaving an 'appearing commissioner' in cost. Congress additionally did no longer legislate parameters on 501C4's that have been being set up for in basic terms political applications, leaving the organization without good chief, to conceal their ***. So evidently 'Conservative' communities weren't plenty the "aim" of the IRS, via fact the low putting fruit via the overpowering numbers of 501C4 applications for in basic terms political applications coming from conservative communities. no longer in basic terms that, the full information Cycle in this organization began via a planted question at a convention. The IRS had caught wind of the practice 2 years in the past and had it investigated via the inspector time-honored. The investigating confirmed the doubtful flagging practice that caught as a rule conservative communities to be in use. A record improve into arranged for booklet. The planted question improve into to place forth the reason the IG record approximately to return out. So the undertaking improve into chanced on, investigated and stopped all before all of us particularly had wind of it. no longer something left however the fallout. this might in basic terms be a 'scandal' if the practice improve into invented on the optimal point of the administration, and then justice obstructed via the optimal point with the intention to guard the practice or shelter the architects of the practice (e.g. Watergate, Iran Contra). yet that's low point organization mis-administration, caught, investigated and addressed via the equipment in place to do precisely that with 0 direct involvement via extreme officers. So it particularly is no longer the President's pastime to provide up interior the wake of a 'scandal', yet to striking the practices and management of the organization.

Answer 3

9/11 is all that Rudy has . He promises can't be believed just ask his ex-wives. His judgement is flawed, his ex-police chief. He did clean up NY but he also was not liked by the police and fire unions. All they do is protect us you know the first responders.

Answer 4

have you been drinking??? ok he did good...of course he did good. he saved nyc. what in gods name is stronger than that??? in todays dangerous society we need someone of action and conviction who understands the reality of terrorism and knows how to manage it. to answer your question, rudy knows nothing of the kind. there is nothing wrong with running on your record and the past is a perfect barometer. lets take hillary for example.
this is CLEARLY guilt by participation...NOT by association.

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
no sane sober individual could possilby expect her to be that close and not be inolved...the idea that she wasnt inovled or didnt know is totally absurd. again, in this case the past is in fact a prefect barometer.

Answer 5

He IS still using it to score points. Your assumption is false.

Should he be able to? Probably not, but that's politics.