Giuliani has been sweating about a lot of things lately. He relationship with Kerik, ordering the NYPD to walk his mistress' dog and trying to conceal to the public his mistress' spending. It's all crashing down for Rudy.
2007-12-01 11:04:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by AB17 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
I propose that the better cut back for contributions be accomplished away with, and that the optimum payouts in retirement nonetheless proceed to be as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social protection isn't a "provide away" application yet one which all of us make contributions to love a discounts plan, and could be risk-free against different makes use of by the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? in case you're so hectic approximately it then why do not you; first positioned it back into the non-public sector and make to have been no can take out funds from it for their very own pastime, 2d pay back each and every penny you have borrowed from the two Social protection and Medicare, 0.33 take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over here yet in no way paid a penny to it, and ultimately have it an analogous for each guy or woman; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they opt for something greater they do it on their very own with out the tax payers investment it?yet, the financial stytem feeding the imbalances had in no way been truly replaced. They, a team of scholars, suggested that one and all fees of pastime could be 3% or much less for each guy or woman to grow to be wealthy if needed (that could desire to be genuine additionally to taces). the ideal financial concern could be, they pronounced, whilst there have been no fees of pastime. Why not attempt this answer? the wealthy could nonetheless be wealthy. My question is: whilst soial protection will become a issue related to federal money owed, why not artwork with a balanced or earnings funds and spend no greater beneficial than is supplied in, as any relatives has to attempt for? Why not ban all loobying presents with a view to get rules that serve the country? God bless united states of america.
2016-10-10 00:49:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by parson 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he was, it's because he was worried about Ron Paul's health. Ron Paul looks like he's about to pop a blood vessel every time he answers. RP really should drop out of the race. He has no chance of winning and it's cutting his life span. For an elderly person, that's really not a good thing.
2007-12-02 00:05:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Didn't notice that but I didn't see the entire debate. Giuliani is really an embarassment. I do give him credit for NY but he seems to be getting a lot of credit for 9/11. Is sickening.
2007-12-01 11:03:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by cynical 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
I did not see that, but would like to have. I guess Giuliana is feeling the heat from the Ron Paul campaign.
2007-12-01 11:23:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by acedelux 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I missed it...but Rudy needs to start sweating...
Go Ron Paul!
2007-12-01 11:36:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by KERMIT M 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
You must be kidding. If he was physically sweating, it is very unlikely that it was due to seeing a commercial. It seems more likely that his body was overheated secondary to environmental conditions. When we get overheated, we humans sweat to bring down the body temperature.
2007-12-01 11:10:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by vegaswoman 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Nope can't say I noticed that.
2007-12-01 11:08:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by SFC_Ollie 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ron kicks his butt.....
That is the ONLY reason i watch them repub debates
2007-12-01 11:08:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
All of the former mayor's activity is beginning to catch up with him.
2007-12-01 11:06:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by MY NAME MICHELLE I HATE AMERICA 5
·
2⤊
3⤋