Have you woken up to 9/11 truth? or are you still brainwashed by the lies from your TV & mass media deceivers?

Question

Melting temperature for steel = 1532 C, but temperature for any
fuel air fire whose only source of oxygen is open air = 233 to 250 C.

Videos & photos of Molten Metal on 9/11 - impossible to create from an air fire!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JithuVAIb7Y

Controlled demolitions of 3 WTC buildings:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa7PN-8T2VY

Building 7 was not hit by any plane or seriously damaged:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ9BofDUXv0
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2073592843640256739

Flight 93 - where is the wreckage and debris? :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-59kouBgO_s&NR=1

Pentagon - where is the 80 tonnes of jet plane debris? :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rgyq2H7PpO0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSeaZLYViwU

Detailed scientific analysis of what happened on 9/11:

http://truth911.net
http://seeloosechange.com
http://911weknow.com
http://belowgroundsurface.org

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 truth

http://ae911truth.org

Answer 1

I don't believe the media, I believe the scientists.

And every single one says the conspiracy science is rubbish.

On the other hand, who made all these internet movies & what are their condentials????

The following is a list of REAL experts who REJECT the conspiracy theory:

-- The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057

-- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. See http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

--NIST (National Institute on Science and Technology):
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
Also see the lead investigator of NIST explain the collapse at
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
Click on "Impact to Collapse"

-- The leading demolition journal in the world is against the conspiracy theorists:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

-- Purdue (http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html

--Professor Bazant (Northwestern Dept of Civil Engineering) is one of only 14 people to win the Prager Award in engineering. He first described the collapse mechanism as follows: http://www.debunking911.com/ProgressiveCollapseWTC-6-23-2006.pdf

--FEMA along with American Society of Civil Engineers, did an extensive analysis of the WTC collapse (ASCE/FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Study (BPS) Team)
http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/mat_fema403.shtm
It’s useful to see the investigation team & their credentials at: http://www.asce.org/responds/wtc_team.cfm

-- Popular Mechanics published a huge article citing 300 renowned experts in demolition & engineering.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

-- Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that was running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives during the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

--The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

-- Scientific American. See
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000

--------------articles available on-line
“Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation”
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html

“Engineers Explain WTC Collapse”
http://www.architectureweek.com/2002/0529/news_3-1.html

“Twin towers research refutes 9/11 conspiracy theories”
http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,,2166832,00.html

“Report Ties WTC Collapses to Column Failures”
http://enr.construction.com/news/buildings/archives/040119.asp

“It was the fire, caused the twin tower collapse”
http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/Fire.html

“Simulation for the collapse of WTC after aeroplane impact “
http://www.luxinzheng.net/publications/english_WTC.htm
Lu XZ., Yang N., Jiang JJ. Structure Engineer, 66(sup.). 2003, 18-22

“Elaboration on Aspects of the Postulated Collapse of the World Trade Centre Twin Towers “
HERA: Innovation in Metals. 2001. 13 December 2001.
http://www.hera.org.nz/PDF%20Files/Elaboration%20on%20WTC%20Paper.PDF

Monahan, B.
"World Trade Center Collapse-Civil Engineering Considerations"
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction v. 7, no. 3, (2002): 134-135.
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PPSCFX000007000003000134000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes

Newland, D.E., & Cebon, D.
"Could the World Trade Center Have Been Modified to Prevent Its Collapse?"
Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 7, (2002):795-800.
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=JENMDT000128000007000795000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes

Answer 2

It is possible that the blaze, started by jet fuel and then engulfing the contents of the offices, in a highly confined area, generated fire conditions significantly more severe than those anticipated in a typical office fire.

Eventually, the loss of strength and stiffness of the materials resulting from the fire, combined with the initial impact damage, would have caused a failure of the truss system supporting a floor, or the remaining perimeter columns, or even the internal core, or some combination. Failure of the flooring system would have subsequently allowed the perimeter columns to buckle outwards. Regardless of which of these possibilities actually occurred, it would have resulted in the complete collapse of at least one complete storey at the level of impact.

Once one storey collapsed all floors above would have begun to fall. The huge mass of falling structure would gain momentum, crushing the structurally intact floors below, resulting in catastrophic failure of the entire structure. While the columns at say level 50 were designed to carry the static load of 50 floors above, once one floor collapsed and the floors above started to fall, the dynamic load of 50 storeys above is very much greater, and the columns at each level were almost instantly destroyed as the huge upper mass fell to the ground.

Answer 3

The truth can hurt more initially. But a lie hurts much worse in the long run.

Answer 4

I lost two people I knew who were on the plane which hit the Pentagon. So, take your theories and stick them where the sun doesn't shine. You people make me sick!

Answer 5

Yes, I believe that airplanes were crashed by terrorists and no, I do not believe the tabloids, etc. Facts are facts and my eyes no speak with forked tongue.

Answer 6

Get real. You are a conspiracy nut. Do you even realize how many people would need to keep a secret that big? Even Bill Maher thinks you guys are whackos.

Answer 7

It's you again...aren't you that crazy professor from yesterday? Go back to your bunker and design something worthwhile for mankind!

Answer 8

9/11 was an inside job. Bush Administration are the real terrorists to watch out for. 'Loose Change final part' should only be viewed by viewers with an open mind. I don't believe in much things but I certainly believe that an investigation into 9/11 should be taking extremely seriously for the sake of our unborn children.

BUSH CONTROLS THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND PEOPLE ON HERE BELIEVE IN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA. PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA DON'T BELIEVE IN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA.

Answer 9

liberal F A G get a F u Ck IN Life, your the one who is brainwashed,

Answer 10

WHO CARES IT WAS SIX YEARS AGO MOVE ON