a self important, egotistical, bread for the position, socialist, lying, crook. Lawyer.
"WE are the President"
2007-12-01 10:48:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Forgotten 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't care for her, but she's still better than any of the Republican candidates, who are the biggest bunch of morally corrupt cowards I've ever seen (McCain excepted).
I don't think you know what a socialist is. And you don't explain what the problem is with being pro-UN. I'm an American, and I think the UN would work if the United States would take a more responsible position when it comes to respecting international institutions.
2007-12-01 10:43:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hillary is like a psychopath when it comes to telling the truth; she lies completely without remorse, or even a second thought.
She is a bitter, duplicitous, conniving, power-mad woman, aging without grace. She is totally consumed by her desire to get into the White House. It's not even a matter of will anymore. If she loses, she'll probably have a nervous breakdown. Emotionally, she has everything invested in this. Losing is not an option for her.
Hillary lies so casually, she doesn't even blink. When she told the gullible voters in New York she only wanted to be their Senator, wise Republicans cautioned voters that it was a sham. We knew it was just a blatant stepping stone to getting a bid for the White House. Considering she never even passed one bill during her Senate tenure, we were obviously right.
If anyone wants to read the abysmal depths of her character, read Dick Morris' book, "Condi Vs. Hillary".
2007-12-01 10:49:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I personally think she'd do a heck of a better job as President than Bush is doing.....I can't wait till he is OUT of office!!! And if she is "evil and corruption defined" for the Democratic side then Bush is definately the Republican equivilant..At least Hillary has some brains in that head of hers.
2007-12-01 10:49:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Miss Useless Knowledge 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not that quick to demonize people. I find that to be completely unrealistic. I find it difficult to imagine her running for president if it weren't for Bill even though she really does have some impressive credentials in many ways.
I also dislike that she seems more bent on helping minority groups and women than in basing her campaign on helping the country for all citizens. I also resent her attempts at bribery to win votes based on things like giving all newborns $5,000.
I want the Congress to have hearings and do studies on why health care is so expensive instead of having a universal health plan. I don't think she'll win the nomination once people really consider what she stands for.
2007-12-01 10:53:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Secretary of State did not refuse any requests for extra protection. those judgements are actually not made at that time. I do desire a fragment of this point of project have been shown for the 13 human beings who died for the period of fifty 4 seperate assaults on diplomatic compounds for the period of the Bush administration. in keeping with possibility in case you human beings had cared then Benghazi would not have occurred in the 1st place.
2016-10-10 00:48:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by parson 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great answer Adam B
We're just going to (at some point) have to ignore these Hillary haters. You people are putting out approx. 1 question (non-question ) every couple minutes...O.K! we get it... you're afraid of her because she is sensible. Calm down...maybe you'll get lucky and we'll elect another monkey. BTW...thanks R.P.and B. for not attaching your giant hate Bill Clinton list, and Hey pachl@sb Dick Morris was fired by the Clintons because he was an embarrassment. He was hiring hookers to suck their toes!! You bought his booK? are you ...a
2007-12-01 10:48:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Richard R 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hillary is much worse than you say. Not only is she corrupt and a liar, but she is doing it in the name of democracy.
2007-12-01 10:49:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
She supports the occupation of Iraq - which has already killed more than 1.1 MILLION people - and is in the pockets of the arms and pharma companies.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html
2007-12-01 14:57:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by MarjaU 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think she is a politician. And this answer is not a joke. Make of it what you will.
2007-12-01 11:00:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Z 1
·
1⤊
0⤋