I want a Hunter/Huckabee combo, but Im almost sure McCain and Gulianni will be running the show.
2007-12-01 09:06:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
i don't think of it concerns precisely the place the funds comes from that's going to fee so a lot greater funds than what it does precise now. If those expenses are exceeded directly to the buyer then all of us will pay for it that way if legislations is exceeded to enhance up taxes to conceal it then (those with out clever accountants will in all likelihood could pay) the ordinary public will pay. IF the fee spiral may well be controlled as is was hoping by utilising Obama then the well being as properly because of the fact the profitability of yankee company will strengthen. the main earnings of generally occurring well being care is the humanity afforded by utilising having help to those in prefer. Reluctance and scoffing at its proposed earnings is a results of the enormous ABUSE perpetrated by utilising unscrupulous operators who've been defrauding the Medicare & different systems. the ecu device of fee further tax is a validation of the basis of all members paying a proportion for the elementary stable---it sounds relatively great yet my chum in Germany who has corollary financial problems has no scientific coverage and is tax broke besides!! Germany continues to be procuring the absorption of Deutsche Demokratische Republic so won't be a honest parallel even nonetheless our device is overburdened with welfare for unfavorable human beings and for Wall highway. on account that our government is now interior the corporate of bailing out failed businesses while they attain a definite length what's the definition of earnings any way ??
2016-11-13 04:25:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by prottsman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Democrats are complete idiots if they think a woman or someone with the name Obama can win. Do you really think the south, which can control who gets in office by population alone, will vote for either of those. I don't know who will win but I can say for certain it won't be a democrat is that's who's running.
The Republicans basically handed the election to the democrats and this is all they can come up with? This is exactly why the dems aren't in office now.
2007-12-01 09:06:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rick 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
I will not be voting for who I think will win, but rather who I think will be the better president. If everyone voted with that in mind rather than their vote being what amounts to a bet on who they think will win we might have a different result. Instead, the media is directing the votes by playing on the win lose instead of issues. Bottm line, who I think will win the presidency is worth only what my vote is.
2007-12-01 09:09:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
None of the above. I have a hunch, that since the election is still 11 months away, people will get sick of all the campaigning and all the BS that goes with it.
i just have a crazy hunch that come the conventions, one of the parties will wheel out a candidate no one was expecting, and since he is a fresh face, he will attract those who are either turned off now or will be before long.
My guess, Tom Ridge, former governor of PA. If you think I'm crazy, I agree! its just a gut feeling.
2007-12-01 09:08:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by TedEx 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hillary will win.
It's a Done Deal.
The News Media and the Rich Ruling Class Democrats, that control the country, decided this in 1993.
Old News......Nothing has changed.
2007-12-01 09:08:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by dinamuk 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Romney
2007-12-01 09:20:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Robert S 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hilary Clinton
2007-12-01 09:04:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
My bet is Hillary Rodham Clinton.She is the most qualified of all the candidates.
2007-12-01 09:10:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lady Scorpio 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Hilary best qualified?? She will run our country into the ground. I'm crossing my fingers for Fred
2007-12-01 09:16:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Scott 3
·
1⤊
2⤋