and suggest that they read more than just the title of the article they provide as evidence?
2007-12-01 04:55:18 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
harryd, maybe you would like to actually read the question and reconsider what it actually means.
2007-12-01 05:02:15 · update #1
well bugeyes returns, they sure aren't conservatives as they claim. I'm more willing to use a different term if you would like to suggest one.
2007-12-01 05:03:13 · update #2
louy lefty, your naswer was good, until you posted a youtube link
2007-12-01 05:15:13 · update #3
*louy lefty, your answer was good, until you posted a youtube link
2007-12-01 05:15:39 · update #4
yes LeAnne, which is usually present to counter their argument in the articles they link to.
2007-12-01 05:16:52 · update #5
the neo-cons are starting to realize that they are irrelevant to the American public and are just acting out of desperation these days
2007-12-01 05:07:11 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Firstly in order to counter a neocon is to not use emotive language which they view as weak and a sign of a left wing person. Instead really know your statistics and sources, including the neocons own sources and then bury them in a nice friendly manner in their own horse$hit.
It really helps to know how and why the neocons came in to being. If you can get hold of it watch the excellent BBC documentary "The Power of Nightmares" as it's the most accurate and detailed look at the neocon creed that's been produced for TV.
2007-12-01 13:20:28 · answer #2 · answered by Ian W 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Truth is, whether you're naughty or nice, the best way to counter any ones argument is with valid and verifiable facts to the contrary - not ob-blog websites, fictional "documentaries" and deceptive half-truths.
2007-12-01 13:10:32 · answer #3 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
First of all, I'd suggest you stop using the hackneyed "neocon" moniker. It means nothing, therefore your question means nothing and is not a real question.
But, to placate the YA Nazis, I'll answer by stating sure.
2007-12-01 12:59:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes stop Labels we should all be Americans,reserch both sides of issues
2007-12-01 13:07:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no neo-cons here. Nor under the bed. Nope. None outside the window either.
2007-12-01 12:59:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, the best way to counter a neo-con argument is with actual knowledge of the subject. Name calling isn't arguing, it's a defense mechanism.
2007-12-01 12:59:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
the best counter argument is TRUTH - or as least in a perfect world
2007-12-01 13:09:23 · answer #8 · answered by celvin 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
boo-hoo the frickin neocon scares the bejesus out of me!
2007-12-01 13:06:36 · answer #9 · answered by realitycheck 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think that's exactly the best way.
2007-12-01 13:04:14 · answer #10 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋