during the CNN Republican Candidates Debate on 28 November ? Why did they avoid ?
2007-12-01 04:18:45 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Infact how to stop Hillary from winning was their collective goal.They do not think how they can win. Will Americans endorse such negativity ?
2007-12-01 04:27:10 · update #1
Of course not... they were too busy throwing mud at each other.
2007-12-01 04:23:50 · answer #1 · answered by Fern O 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I recommend that the top shrink for contributions be performed away with, and that the optimal payouts in retirement nonetheless stay as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social protection isn't a "supply away" application yet one that all of us make contributions to love a low fee rates plan, and could be shielded from different makes use of by utilising the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? while you're so fearful approximately it then why do not you; first placed it back into the interior maximum sector and make to have been no can take out funds from it for his or her own activity, 2nd pay back each penny you have borrowed from the two Social protection and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over right here yet never paid a penny to it, and ultimately have it the comparable for each guy or woman; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they like something greater they do it on their own with out the tax payers investment it?yet, the financial stytem feeding the imbalances had never been relatively replaced. They, a team of scholars, reported that all and sundry expenditures of activity may well be 3% or much less for each guy or woman to grow to be prosperous if needed (which would be actual additionally to taces). the terrific financial difficulty may well be, they reported, while there have been no expenditures of activity. Why not try this answer? the prosperous might nonetheless be prosperous. My question is: while soial protection turns right into a topic linked to federal charges, why not artwork with a balanced or earnings budget and spend no greater effective than is offered in, as any kinfolk has to attempt for? Why not ban all loobying presents with the intention to get regulations that serve the country? God bless usa.
2016-11-13 03:38:07 · answer #2 · answered by tameka 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do they need to debate those issues in a debate designed to give Republican voters the chance to choose which candidate they want to nominate?
2007-12-01 04:25:55 · answer #3 · answered by Victor S 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Anything to take off the focus on their own scandals and unthruths..
Repubs strategy..lets not talk about how we will further mess up this country, lets talk about how democrats are incompetant.
But in the end, who is responsible for 4000 american soldier deaths, and trillions of debt BASED ON LIES and coverup
2007-12-01 04:42:58 · answer #4 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You would have to ask the liberals that Q. to CNN who hosted the show. (This Q has already been asked).
Why should anyone talk about Hilary's failed health care or her ideas?
I thought the focus was about the Republican views and not Hilary's.
Besides if Hilary's name had been brought up, I think it would have been a taboo as no one really likes to hear that name.
2007-12-01 04:41:19 · answer #5 · answered by Stars and Stripes 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because hillary is not the nominee and theres a good chance they will never face her.
If the DNC wakes up she will not be on the ticket unless defeat is their goal.
2007-12-01 04:22:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
too many gay retired army generals in the republican debate audience asking stupid questions.
btw, that general works for hillary. how pathetic.
2007-12-01 04:25:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Would you please rewrite this only in English next time?
2007-12-01 04:21:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋