instead of attacking their opponents records? Who has a history of legitimate experience and integrity?
2007-12-01 04:05:18 · 13 answers · asked by No It All 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
THINK FOR YOURSELF!
Most candidates attack each other's past records, instead of pointing out their own accomplishments and integrity.
Why?
Who is the most honest?
2007-12-01 04:08:45 · update #1
Clinton and Obama have little experience.
Romney and Guliani have good experience and pretty good track records.
2007-12-01 04:08:46 · answer #1 · answered by harvardbeans 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Easy Ron Paul, his record is more consistent then any other candidate running
2007-12-01 12:08:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul
2007-12-01 12:07:38 · answer #3 · answered by lyates93 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Ron Paul
2007-12-01 12:07:23 · answer #4 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Mike Jingozian
www.resetamerica.com
2007-12-01 12:10:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
You mean there are some that CAN stand on their own record?????
I never would have guessed it.
2007-12-01 15:01:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A Lincoln
2007-12-01 12:07:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Duncan Hunter
ron paul is more consistent than Hunter?
Jesus, some of you people need to wake up.
Unlike Paul, Duncan Hunter promotes policies that are good for America.
Paul is an isolationist. regardless of what he says
2007-12-01 12:07:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Romney.
2007-12-01 12:08:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Ron Paul
everyone else is looking at him and his gains in popularity......to which they are softening their idiotic positions to compensate against him. at least that's what i've noticed.
2007-12-01 12:20:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋