English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is strapping bombs to one's self, and such hysteria indicative of what we can expect if Hillary were to be elected President?

I know the terrorists hope she gets into office, so they can do it. But will everyone be in such a frenzy, that we will have to fight it domestically and internationally?

2007-12-01 02:44:17 · 15 answers · asked by DesignDiva1 5 in Politics & Government Politics

I know he is mentally ill (so are a lot of people), and I know even the Clintons aren't deranged enough to plant even this.

But why her? Will terrorists do it because she's a weak leader? Will others here do it because they can't stand her?

To who stated this - Why do we "NEED" a woman pres or Obama? What have they done that makes us "need" them? Is it just because she's a woman and because he's an african american? THEN wouldn't it make more sense to have an african american woman, if that's out "need"?

Should Condi then run for Pres?

2007-12-01 02:55:42 · update #1

Sentinel - You're absolutely right. That's what I was wondering.

2007-12-01 02:58:12 · update #2

15 answers

The person may have been mentally disturbed, but he had a choice between Clinton's Campaign Office, and Obama's Office just across the street. Why did he choose the Clinton Office is more to the point. What did he have against her?
That would be the question to which his response would be what most of us would be interested in hearing.

2007-12-01 02:55:22 · answer #1 · answered by Sentinel 5 · 4 0

Hillary has about as much of a chance of winning the presidential election as I do of winning the lottery.

It wouldn't surprise me if it was planned all along. Hillary is one conniving individual and will go to great lengths to do such a thing to try to gain some sympathy support.

2007-12-01 02:49:51 · answer #2 · answered by Bubba 6 · 6 1

This is an isolated case brought on by a poor, mentally ill individual. Hillary and camp are probably happier than clams at all the free publicity and attention.

2007-12-01 02:47:55 · answer #3 · answered by TheHumbleOne 7 · 6 0

I believe Hillary will bring about this sort of reaction more often than any other candidate could.

She is polarizing by nature and has the ability to appear menacing in her demeanor.

As a country, we don't need her.

2007-12-01 03:18:46 · answer #4 · answered by wider scope 7 · 1 0

Florida has its own Baker Act for the insane. If New Hampshire doesn't take care of its own mental health cases, they need to get moving.
The federal government is not responsible and should never be totally responsible for every medical case in the country.

2007-12-01 03:05:55 · answer #5 · answered by vincefoster 3 · 3 0

If Hillary did a nude unfold for Playboy or different porno mag, it may reason hundreds of thousands of fellows to completely provide up finding at porn! they could in no way be waiting to get that photograph out of their recommendations!

2016-10-10 00:09:40 · answer #6 · answered by smyers 4 · 0 0

Honestly, the thought crossed my mind that this was a publicity stunt for her to "play the hero" --

One of my childhood friends did it, planted a fake bomb at a school so he could find it during his nighttime security guard job and be a hero. Problem was, it was the 2nd "bomb" he'd found in this small town, so it backfired and he went to jail for it.

2007-12-01 02:49:19 · answer #7 · answered by BaseballGrrl 6 · 5 0

That would be considered a quiet day once hillary occupies

the White House!

2007-12-01 02:52:36 · answer #8 · answered by realitycheck 3 · 6 0

I can't believe a woman said what you said. You aren't asking a question, you are slamming Hillary Clinton. SHE is not the one who strapped "road flares" to herself and entered that office. The man was making a statement about not recieving mental health care, whether the method be right or wrong. To leap from that to blaming Hillary is counterintuitive and inane at best.

2007-12-01 02:49:20 · answer #9 · answered by LifeProfessor 3 · 1 4

My first thought was that they (Clinton's) planted this guy for the sympathy vote. A real terrorist would have ensured she was there. It's not like her location wasn't known.

2007-12-01 02:48:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers