... if he admits it?
2007-12-01 02:26:11 · 12 answers · asked by Duminos 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You mean Hillary finally coming and and admitting what we all know?
2007-12-01 02:30:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. Though a president has the title of "Commander in Chief," that does not mean actual military employment is involved.
2007-12-01 11:08:31 · answer #2 · answered by The Snappy Miss Pippi Von Trapp 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, if sHrilery wins her first term, once she wins the second term, THEN she might be able to find the doorknob to her closet. So, sHrillery is your best bet to find out.
I can assure you, sHrillery would never, ever voluntarily give up power, if she had it. After dozens and dozens of crimes, scandals and widespread misuse of power, sHrillery spat in the face of justice as you would expect from a con artist.
Don't foget, it was the Clintons who approved the "don't ask, don't tell" military policy.
2007-12-01 10:41:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You would think he would be restricted to the military justice system...as you know if it were true..then Clinton would have been prosecuted for having an affair...which is illegal under military laws.
2007-12-01 11:00:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I did not know that the prez. is in the military. Sure he is commander in cheif but he answers to nobody.
2007-12-01 10:34:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
I think Clinton was attempting to make private lives private. It's one of the few things I agreed with him on.
2007-12-01 10:30:55 · answer #6 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, if he was then all the world leaders would joke about him.
2007-12-01 10:28:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
no, but dont pick up your pen if you drop it in the oval office...
2007-12-01 10:28:15 · answer #8 · answered by prop4u 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
screw u who says he is
2007-12-01 10:29:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No.
2007-12-01 11:13:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋