Bush wore a freaking ear peice to every damn debate that he had, he rarely said anything that wasnt told to him and when he didnt he was a blubbering idiot. Did anyonec are to notice how Bush worked nicely with dem's in Austin but when he became president he stonewalled them? Hillary CLinton is intelligent and resourceful, confident and respectable. She would be a hundred times better then Bush.
2007-12-01 02:18:50 · 21 answers · asked by darkestsith 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
because the right-wing media is complicit in the crimes of BushCo.
2007-12-01 02:37:57 · answer #1 · answered by Andrew 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Read the Constitution lefty, President Bush is not running in 2008.
Hillary will have to answer to the Clinton graveyard she has in her closet...
2007-12-01 12:10:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton would be about the worst possible president we could have at this point in history. She's divisive, untrustworthy, and utterly devoid of moral convictions. She carpet bagged her way into a position representing New York state (an obvious stepping stone) so that she could say she has a qualification beyond that of Chelsea Clinton to run the country. Having lived in the White House doesn't give you what you need to lead us.
2007-12-01 10:30:50 · answer #3 · answered by sammael_coh 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋
An ear piece??? Really....
And you have photographic evidence of this.......
The democrats in Austin were willing to work with him, as was he willing to work with the democrats in Washington.
As for your comments on Hillary.... She is intelligent, and if by resourceful you mean deceitful, then I'll agree.
She can not be described as confident because she refuses to take a solid stand on real issues.
She has no self respect so she can not be respected.
Have a nice day.
2007-12-01 10:26:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
You lost in 2000, 2004 and it looks like you'll lose in 2008. The constant leftist barrage from liberals and the media sends voters running to the GOP.
2007-12-01 12:31:26 · answer #5 · answered by Best President Ever!!! 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
When has the focus on Bush let up? If the people had focused on Bush like they do Hillary it would be like a vacation for the man!
2007-12-01 10:26:25 · answer #6 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I dont know I mean the Clinton's are so honest and have never been mixed up with any scandles. Why would anyone pick on poor little Hillary. I definately wouldnt cause I dont want to end up missing.
2007-12-01 10:29:23 · answer #7 · answered by JSweed 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
You are so right on!
Because the conservatives wanted to WIN! If they have to prop up the dumbest SOB they can find they will do it. And it's obvious by the candidates they have. They are all a bunch of idiots. It's pretty sad when the former governor of Arkansas, Mike Huckabee looks heads and shoulders better than any of the other candidates. It's just too bad that McCain is past his prime and that George Bush beat him. That's the saddest thing for America.
But, I 100% agree with you and not only that, any of the Democratic candidates far outclass anything on the Republican side, they are all a bunch of losers following after the biggest loser of all, George W. Bush!
2007-12-01 10:28:12 · answer #8 · answered by Jackie Oh! 7 · 1⤊ 6⤋
Because Hillary is Kim Jong Il with sagging mammaries.
2007-12-01 10:23:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Bush sure did seem to get a pass, then after 911 he got not only got a pass but a free ride as well
2007-12-01 11:15:58 · answer #10 · answered by jean 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
What planet are you living on? All the examples you mentioned were all over the media on 04.
2007-12-01 10:26:16 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋