Now that's the million dollar question.
Nothing can be more foolish than cutting taxes and not cutting spending. This is what happened during Reagan's term which led to the first Bush's famous statement "Read my lips. No new taxes."
2007-12-01 01:50:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Perplexed Bob 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
You are correct. Let's start by cutting the bloated, abused welfare system to the bone. Then cut school spending in half. Hell, half the little dummies aren't going to graduate anyway. Medicare? Lose it, the public is tired of paying other people's health bills. Food stamps? Cut it way down. Only give 'em to illegals and career welfare recipients. Listen, man, what exactly would you cut from the budget? What is non-vital? And , most of all, when have you ever heard of any type of govt getting by w less? To these people, a $5 billion increase in budget is a cut, since they demanded $10 billion and didn't get it.
2007-12-01 02:22:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
reducing taxes generates extra gross sales -- the Bush tax cuts proved that to be a faux assumption reducing spending generates a much better financial device -- there is fairly no information of that and that's blatantly ridiculous on it is face. the reason some human beings concern reducing taxes and reducing spending won't close the deficits is considering has already been shown to be fake. We examine historic previous. You examine precise wing re-writes of historic previous. there's a distinction you realize!
2016-10-18 11:31:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the first time a Republican talks about a program that should be cut, 15 Democrats jump up and whine about how evil Republicans are and how they're out to get old people, children, minorities, women, disabled, mentally ill, gum chewers, blondes, bald guys named Luther, Ford owners, non-Christians, rustlers, cut throats, murderers, bounty hunters, desperados, mugs, pugs, thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ***-kickers, s**t-kickers and Methodists.
2007-12-01 02:07:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
It's the plan. They want to, in their own words, "Starve the Beast," which is the US government and it's ability to function. They then want to sell our freedom to Multi-National corporations who often now already work well above the law. Not all Republicans, but definitely the Neocons in there now. Real Republicans, like my own Senator Arlen Spector, would never sell America out for some extra cash.
2007-12-01 01:49:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
So sorry that there are things you can't fathom..cutting bureaucracy transcends politics..Gingrich tried to do it and
was blasted for refusing to fund the Gov't
then again I am not sorry..but glad you do admit you don't understand some things ...it in your attempt to talk smack.
2007-12-01 02:04:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree that's why we need out of the federal reserve go back to the bill of rights
2007-12-01 01:55:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would like to see some belt tightening done in government.
I think there are so many ways we can cut back spending.
2007-12-01 01:50:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Erinyes 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because they want our children to pay for it.
2007-12-01 01:45:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by crushinator01 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
They think it will get them votes. I hope we're not that stupid.
2007-12-01 01:48:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by ash 7
·
1⤊
1⤋