I know that's the current excuse for being inneffective.
2007-12-01 01:11:18 · 12 answers · asked by realitycheck 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
THAT WOULD BE DISASTROUS.
2007-12-01 04:50:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
both the Dem's' and re pubs' can not often agree on some thing even even as they want a similar problem. except you bypass to c-span you gained't see a lot insurance of third social gathering applicants. large corporations make huge contributions to applicants they help,you're restricted in how a lot you may donate to a candidate in my opinion. corporations set up committees and communities to help and fund applicants. the present financial ruin regulations were written by ability of the banking marketplace for congress to make into regulation and it bit them contained in the butt. the different difficulty is that some human beings vote for a million social gathering each and each of the time,both because they help that social gathering each and each of the time and have self belief this is the in basic terms social gathering to do whats properly,or they are dissatisfied with the different social gathering for some reason. both events want it their way and could compromise some to get their way. If what I examine on the internet very last nighttime is even 0.5 genuine,this election gained't be counted besides. If we've yet another attack like 9/11 or a substantial disaster before the elections F.E.M.A . will take administration and George Bush turns into the genuine skill of authorities. If it takes position after the elections and before the recent president takes workplace,i do not comprehend what is going to ensue. G.W. signed an authorities order for the continuity of authorities and F.E.M.A. will take over and droop the structure and the President many times is the team spirit authorities. Congress and the finished courtroom will nonetheless exist yet may have little or no voice,the President has the perfect say in all concerns. there change into also yet another website speaking about the formation of the North American Union (Canada,U.S. and Mexico forming a union like the E.U. and the U.S. structure will be lengthy gone.
2016-10-25 06:06:12 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, that is the excuse for not even trying. Over my dead body will the Dem's get a veto proof majority. I see them losing the slim majority they have now. I definitely see a Republican in the White House for at least the next nine years.
2007-12-01 01:39:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I cannot see that happening unless there are some fundamental changes made in the party.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-12-01 22:02:26 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My Prediction - 2008.
Although we probably won't need it, because a Republican has the same chance as winning in 08 that a Sunni has of surviving in Iraq.
2007-12-01 01:20:56 · answer #5 · answered by ck4829 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I hope not, is it wise to have any party veto proof?
2007-12-01 01:15:23 · answer #6 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Democratic!
Democratic!
Democrat is a noun. A noun cannot describe another noun.when will you whigs stop insulting the opposing party? It makes you sound like asses and help fuel the desire for a veto proof majority!
2007-12-01 01:18:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
When the dictatorship is in full force then you will see veto powers, the constitution, bill of rights ALL gone. We are closer than you think and I am not paranoid!
2007-12-01 01:16:58 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Ain't gonna happen! I think they're going to lose Congress in the next cycle!
2007-12-01 01:14:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
In about a year, yes.
2007-12-01 01:13:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
You had better pray they never do.
2007-12-01 01:14:10 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋