Yes they will. They only like to pay taxes to bail out corperations. They have no heart.
If they say they want to keep all the money they earn, then why don't they fight just as hard to keep their tax money out of the hands of the rich and greedy??
2007-12-01 00:40:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
They are things that can only be discovered after hundreds and hundreds of trials. And of course, strict restriction needs to be in place. However, because the basis of science is always changing due to new discoveries, we need to also have sympathy to the drug company as well. They are not miracle makers, they only try to make profits by selling something that they "think" might help other people. Imagine the world without antibiotics and other medication, how many people would have to die? If we agree that science can be changed, the drug company might not have an excuse of increasing medication prices because of law suit.Also if we look at any other area that has used the socialist system it has bogged down and failed to live up to its Utopian promise. No system is perfect but open and free market is the best out there.
2016-04-07 01:30:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Could you be any less educated?
President Bush has done more to get health care to uninsured people than any other president, but, that is not easy to prove to anyone illiterate enough to believe what you are saying.
What is easy to prove using sinple budget info from BEA.gov and gpoaccess.gov is that Bill Clinton pushed the United States into a recession which, coupled with 9/11, lowed the United States GDP substantially. The reduction in GDP combined with the Clinton budgets of 2001 to 2004 created the current budget deficit.
Bet in that limited education of your you figured Bush wrote those budgets even though it takes years to establish a budget and get it through Congress. The sitting president car make small changes, but, Clinton Budgets ran from 1997 to 2004 and the Bush budgets will run from 2005 to 2012. Check it out at gpoaccess.gov.
Bush 1 budgets, which ran from 1992 to 1996, took a 22% deficit down to 4%. Clinton Budgets went from a deficit of 4% to a deficit of 22%. Bush Budgets so far have taken the 22% deficit down to less than 9% without raising taxes the way Bush 1 did, which is how the mid year Clinton budgets showed a surplus: Bush 1 taxes.
In addition those wonderful budgets that Bill "I did not have sex with that Lying Sl*t" Clinton wrote did not purchase armor for the military and of course the Demophytes in Washington DC blamed the guy who tried to push through extra spending bills in addition to the Clinton budgets to order armor (which can take years to purchase, ramp up manufacturing, deliver and install).
The bottom line is:
Uneducated people blame President Bush for writing a deficit budget that Clinton wrote, for the Clinton recession which caused years of reduced growth in the GDP and for a lack of armor which Clinton refused to buy AND then for adding to the deficit when President Bush ordered the armor that Demophytes insisted President Bush was responsible for because Clinton didn't order it.
All this is easily discernible to any literate person at gpoaccess.gov and bea.gov.
2007-12-01 01:08:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
If Hillary gets elected the political turmoil we've seen for the last 16 years will seem like a child's playground compared to what you will see if that pig gets elected. That I will promise you.
2007-12-01 00:40:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
Yea..right. The "dent" Bush made will become much bigger if she drives..she will total the whole car out.
2007-12-01 01:00:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hillary is just another representative of the ruling elite. She has done nothing to fight against the Bush agenda of imperialist war abroad and repression at home or to impeach him for his many crimes. Her great health care plan is to FORCE the public to buy insurance from the fraudulent insurance companies that Michael Moore only began to touch on in his movie Sicko. Some health care plan. It's a plan to line the pockets of health care executives and investors.
2007-12-01 00:38:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mencken 5
·
3⤊
5⤋
No. You may read her proposals online via her campaign website regarding health care and the National Debt.
2007-12-01 00:38:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by SpeakerT 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
hillary will do nothing to put dent in debt. i bet she'd spend more than any president in history of us. if you are worried about national debt i would steer clear of democrat candidates. and if you care about health care i definately would advise staying away from hillary she will ruin this country's health care system
2007-12-01 00:39:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by negaduck 6
·
6⤊
3⤋
Yes obstruction is one of the favorite tools of the regressive American right. Their unhealthy hostility to Hillary will come before the well being of the American people, it always did. It's sad but the truth. For Republicans ideology comes before America
2007-12-01 00:39:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
1⤊
6⤋
Listen - I don't have health insurance. I'm 'one of those'. But for crying out loud, I sure as shootin' don't want to force people who don't even know me to pay for my heath care. There is a common misnomer in this counrty - people who say "all the people who don't have health care". We ALL have access to health care. I've found docs who will take payments, gone to emergency rooms or urgent care clinics, and had relaatives give me money for some oral surgery. I do my best to take care of myself. Can we please stop asking the government to take care of us???
2007-12-01 00:39:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Katie Short, Atheati Princess 6
·
6⤊
4⤋