English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.muttmats.com/images/cat-mat.jpg

2007-11-30 22:42:52 · 3 answers · asked by Бэлзeбот 2 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

In case you're still scratching your head, here are two hints: Leibniz and his principle of rationality

2007-11-30 22:54:08 · update #1

No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no!
IT'S A MAT! Definitely a mat!

2007-11-30 22:54:56 · update #2

3 answers

If the CAT is not sitting on the MAT, you can call it CAT.

If the MAT gets wrapped around it, you can not call it a CAT.

Your perception of CAT and MAT is relativistic. To
compare one, the other must exist. For the philosopher,
the distinction betwee CAT and MAT is void. Both consist
of void. Compared to the infinete universe, neither the CAT
nor the MAT has any value. The value that you asign
to a CAT or MAT is unique to you. He who needs a
MAT to sleep hates CAT.

2007-11-30 23:14:50 · answer #1 · answered by d_r_siva 7 · 0 0

Yes, the fat cat is sat on a red - cushion, not a mat!

2007-11-30 23:36:13 · answer #2 · answered by Watsit 5 · 0 0

yes . itr can quite conceivably be on the --- cushion !

2007-11-30 22:54:12 · answer #3 · answered by bill g 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers