English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After the Nov. elections Bush won't be able to hide the evidence that it was a Global Hawk that hit the Pentagon and not a 757.


Oooppppsssssss......

2007-11-30 16:42:27 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

As I said in one of your other joke questions,you are a coward,and,,you live in a dream world if you think the Dem's will win anything.
Even if they did,the only truth that will come out is that they are cowards too.It would be the beginning of the end of everything this country was founded on.You need to stop thinking about 9/11 and focus on if you will be in the next building that gets blown up.I wonder who your friends (If you have any)will blame that on?

2007-11-30 16:54:56 · answer #1 · answered by Ronboy 3 · 4 1

There's irrefutable evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon, not a missile:

1) Dozens, if not hundreds, of people stuck on I-395 saw the low-flying plane & their testimony is well-documented in the press. Quoted from Wikipedia, “American Airlines Flight 77”:

... Steve Riskus witnessed the plane crash into the Pentagon, as he was driving along Washington Boulevard and stopped to take photographs moments after the impact.[21] Mary Lyman, who was on I-395, saw the airplane pass over at a "steep angle toward the ground and going fast" and then saw the cloud of smoke from the Pentagon.[22] Jim Sutherland, also on I-395, witnessed the plane pass 50 feet overhead, heading in a straight line into the Pentagon.[23] Mary Ann Owens, of Gannett News Service, was stuck in traffic near the Pentagon when she saw the airplane pass 50 to 75 feet overhead and crash into the Pentagon.[24] Another witness, Daryl Donley, saw the crash as he was driving on Washington Boulevard. Among debris that was scattered as the plane crashed, he found a "scorched green oxygen tank marked 'Cabin air. Airline use'" on the road.[24] Mr. Donley also had a camera with him, and took some of the first photographs after the crash.[25] USA Today reporter Mike Walter, while driving on Washington Boulevard, also witnessed the crash.[26] He recounted to CNN, "...looked out my window. I saw this plane, the jet, American Airlines jet coming. And I thought, this doesn't add up. It's really low. And I saw it. It just went — I mean, it was like a cruise missile with wings, it went right there and slammed right into the Pentagon. Huge explosion."[13]
(This is about half the witnesses, to save space)
================
2) Clear wreckage of a plane was found & photographs were printed in all the papers. Here's a nice photo from 9/11 that clearly shows plane wreckage:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=6#bigplane
(scroll down after clicking)
================
3)Yes, the hole in the Pentagon was somewhat smaller than the diameter of the plane. This is explained by Professor Mere Sozen, a “Kettelhut Distinguished Professor Civil Engineering” at Perdue University. Prof. Sozen says that it’s the energy of the plane, not its size that determines the size of the hole. The plane is not a cartoon character that punches out its outline. Moving at 531 MPH it more fluid than solid and this explains why you get the hole you got. See:
http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html

=====
4) The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

The report contains color photos from the relevant Pentagon security camera which was going at 1 frame/sec. It shows a blurry shot of the plane.

The report contains abundant references to plane debris & body parts found in the Pentagon. For example, on page 26 it says:

“The remains of most of the passengers on the aircraft were found near the end of the travel of the aircraft debris. The front landing gear (a relatively solid and heavy object) and the flight data recorder (which had been located near the rear of the aircraft) were also found nearly 300 ft into the structure. By contrast, the remains of a few individuals (the hijacking suspects), who most likely were near the front of the aircraft, were found relatively close to the aircraft’s point of impact with the building."

The remains of the passengers were DNA-matched to relatives.

5) Controllers in Boston spotted & actually tracked Flight 77 as it flew from the Midwest to and into the Pentagon. They ordered the F16s over New York to fly to Washington to intercept it but they were too late. Are all these controllers insane?

6) Hundreds of rescue workers found plane debris & body parts. Many accounts of this were published in the papers.

7) If it was a missile, then where did Flight 77 & all its passengers go ?....

2007-12-01 01:38:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

What in God's name is a "Global Hawk"? Does it carry baggage and sport a 757 tail and wings? You know like what was spread out on the Pentagon mall? How about the pieces of bodies of the passengers and aircrew? God save us from the morons like you that can't see the truth.

2007-11-30 16:48:14 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 9 1

nicely residing contained in the state of Alabama and also a resident of 1st viscount montgomery of alamein, the position bright change into the former mayor I have large comprehend-how of Mr. bright. Mr. bright isn't a Blue dogs, he ameliorations viewpoints as to whats the wide-spread problem to do. Mr. bright could thank Obama because if Obama did not run for president in "08, the Black democratic voters of the state don't have confirmed as a lot because the polls and voted for him. His Republican canidate Jay Love change into killing him contained in the polls in the course of the campaign, yet those polls did not evaluate the extreme finally end up of African American voters who voted for Obama and different democrats. once back comprehend your stuff before leaping on the bandwagons of soundbites.

2016-10-25 05:54:21 · answer #4 · answered by wexler 4 · 0 0

This makes absolutely no sense. There is nothing the govt could possibly have gained from bombing the Pentagon that couldn't have been gained more easily with less risk in some other fashion.

By the way what happened to the plane and the passengers that dissappeared that day?

2007-11-30 16:50:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

Raking up another conspiracy theory which has been debunked years ago?

Were the passengers and flight crew abducted by aliens?

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html

Here's proof that a jetliner hit the Pentagon and not a missile:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

2007-11-30 17:40:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Was Barbara Olsen aboard that Global Hawk? She died on that plane.

Conspiracy loon.

2007-11-30 16:52:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

Lay off the Kool Aid!!!

2007-11-30 16:49:29 · answer #8 · answered by Socks 5 · 6 1

Smoke just a little crack. Then you may keep watch for the next bogey man conspiracy.

2007-11-30 16:53:22 · answer #9 · answered by Charles S 4 · 4 1

Did you know that the guy who held hostages at the Clinton headquarters was a conspiracy theorist. What is wrong with you people!!

2007-11-30 16:46:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

fedest.com, questions and answers