Usually the media follows the money.
2007-11-30 15:23:19 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What you call "spam", is actually:
a. the truth.
b. truth spread by someone who believes in democracy.
So which are you more afraid of, the truth, or democracy?
2007-11-30 15:28:44 · update #1
You could be right shad. But the war is actually pretty important.
2007-11-30 15:29:21 · update #2
Why is someone who raises the most money "unelectable"?
2007-11-30 15:29:44 · update #3
Source:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1107/7105.html
2007-11-30 15:30:28 · update #4
Because there are bigger issues than that. And no one cares. Never heard of him til a couple days ago.
2007-11-30 15:27:07 · answer #1 · answered by Joshot 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I don't know why I am wasting my time in answering this question that is not 100% accurate. While, Ron Paul may have raised more money than any other Republican Candidate in a 48 period, he is way behind in total fund raising compared to Rudy, Romney, and Thompson. Romney has already spent 4-5 times what Ron Paul has managed to raise.
And if we look at the Democrats, both Hillary and Barack have raised almost 10 times than Ron. And maybe you are right about the media following the money, because they both get more media coverage than any Republican Candidate.
2007-12-01 02:56:01 · answer #2 · answered by oldcorps1947 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its not bigger news because he hasn't sold out to corporations like every other candidate. and those of you calling him a fascist need to go research his positions a little better. a fascist would not be a supporter of the constitution
2007-12-01 00:06:53 · answer #3 · answered by paul4prez 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If Ron Paul wasn't against the war,you libs would be calling him a fascist.
2007-11-30 23:27:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
because no one takes ron paul seriously... so it really doesn't matter because he's not going to get the republican nomination.
2007-11-30 23:54:42 · answer #5 · answered by Tara 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why should it be news that conservatives are on the take for corrupt policies they would support for free, just to be pricks?
2007-11-30 23:32:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Because he's not electable. And he will never get the nomination so why waste time covering a dream scenario.
2007-11-30 23:28:16 · answer #7 · answered by David M 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I hope it is true but I don't think so. What is your source?
2007-11-30 23:28:28 · answer #8 · answered by commonsense 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because the fix is in, he's not supposed to win.
2007-11-30 23:27:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋