Do Sempron processors suck as bad as Celerons?

Answer 1

Intel’s representative in low-end market is Celeron D, while Sempron is AMD’s. Both Celeron D and Sempron are in fact versions of the high-end Intel and AMD processors with reduced features. Celeron D is a “light” version of Pentium 4, and Sempron is a “cut” version of Athlon XP or Athlon 64.

Celeron D

Celeron D is based on Pentium 4 with Prescott core, uses 90 nanometres technology, 16 KB of L1 cache, 256 KB of L2 cache, runs externally at 533 MHz (133 MHz transferring four data per clock tick), support to SSE3 multimedia instructions and Execute Disable technology, FC-PGA2 package, 478- or 775-pin socket, and can be found with clocks from 2.53 GHz to 3.2 GHz.

From: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/192/1

So, They are pretty much the same-suxzors. A core 2 duo @ 1.50GHz could crush a Celeron/Sempron going @ 3.0GHz

basically: GO TO DUAL-CORE

2 cores are better than 1.

Answer 2

Without so many words...

YES

Answer 3

Has u can see......just say



YES......