English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I’m tired of all these pre stone age apeish politicians in congress telling us that we don’t have a right to bear arms! I’m sick of tree hugging numbskulls in schools telling me that ‘guns are dangerous’ and we shouldn’t use them!

I mean, what the hell am I going to do if I find a german kid in my sisters room raping her? ((lol))

What exactly am I going to do?

Am I going to ask him to stop?

Am I going to give up and leave the room?

I mean, why do they expect me to do about it if I can't bear arms like Second Ammendment mentality in the back of my mind tells me to?


______________________________________


In MY opinion, there is only one way to stop evil like that in our society, and it starts with a gun bullet and ends with their skull, lots of blood splattered in between.

That's strange too, because usually I try not to be a very violent person.

________

And now for the point:

What do you guys think about all that 'changing the Second Ammendment?'

2007-11-30 13:11:33 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

itssoeasy:

I know I'm arrogant, but what would you do if you walked into (say you have a sister) and you walk into their room, and thei being attacked. Do you say 'Oh noez! I can't defend myself from them because guns are bad!'

Wow.

2007-11-30 13:25:00 · update #1

Nice edit, so you're saying 'Violence is baaaddd' and 'it causes wars' yet, here you are saying 'no, you can use a baseball bat or something else' when I asked you how to defend yourself.


Again:

Wow.

2007-11-30 13:33:44 · update #2

x3 Thank you everyone who has posted their views without being rude towards me or other members.


^^ I was afraid I'd cause a huge uproar and get jumped on, lol. I'm glad that we can share our Political Views easily without getting into an internet brawl. lol

2007-11-30 14:01:53 · update #3

miss schlonky:

I won't retort with anything about your country, or about you, because it is indeed against the Yahoo! Answers rules.


You should start thinking before you type little insults like though, though.

2007-11-30 16:39:41 · update #4

ll_jenny_ll:

I thank you for your feedback, but try not to insult other countries because you think yours is so much supierior.

That is exactly what the last person was into trouble for, because that goes against the Yahoo! Answers rules.

Like I told her, I will not reply with anything rude, and also, itssoeasy broke the rules too; cursing goes against the guidelines set by Yahoo! personel.

2007-12-01 05:34:08 · update #5

16 answers

Amen to that.
ut oh, now I'm gonna be labeled an enemy combative. ( for supporting my 2nd Amendment rights) Well, at least, I hope I can get free use of the medical facilities. While I'm in a secret government detention center.

2007-11-30 15:34:53 · answer #1 · answered by Yahoo 4 · 2 0

Okay, first of all, itssoeasy, I would like to know how you think she is ignorant and sick? It isn't like she is going out there and shooting people? She isn't ignorant, you obviously must be for even going so far as to say that. She isn't saying violence is good, she is simply saying that there are times when it IS needed because there are stupid people out there that will try to do bad things and that would be the safest way. Either way, you could shoot them in the foot, it would hurt like hell, but what would they be able to do? If they came after you again, shoot them in the other foot.

Oh yea, I would LOVE to see you stop a freaking grown man with a stupid baseball bat. What if you don't have one? What if you don't like baseball? I don't have a baseball bat in my house, I hate baseball with a passion so why would I go out and buy a bat, that could break, just to do that. No, that is stupid. That would be like:

'-Robber killer guy comes in-
Me: Oh no! I have a gun under my bed, but that is for hunting! I will just go buy myself a baseball bat right this minute! You wait right here while I go do that'

Where is the sense? Seriously. That is all I have to say.

2007-11-30 14:58:21 · answer #2 · answered by Mandy 1 · 1 0

The founding fathers put the 2nd amendment in the constitution to protect the people from being robbed in their homes, invaded by other countries and subordinated by a corrupt government.

If the politicians are nervous about good citizens having arms then the politicians should be looking at themselves.

2007-11-30 13:46:33 · answer #3 · answered by RomeoMike 5 · 2 0

well ... I live in Australia .. and while it is difficult to get a permit to carry a hand gun ... and CONTRARY to what you guys believe ... WE CAN own guns .. but you know we don't NEED to .. so most of us don't ...

so we don't have High School shootings
we have extremely rare work place shootings ..

In fact .. this year in Melbourne ..a shooting did take place .. It made National headlines .. Does that happen in the USA .. let's say a single victim shooting murder..in Lubbock Texas.. does that get reported in Cleveland ohio? I mean it isn't BIG news is it ? where as here it was BECAUSE IT IS SO RARE.

By all means if YOU THINK YOU NEED A GUN .. BUT consider the number of Murders that occur in your nation with guns each year .. and .. AH what's the point... you have a gun mentality .. Nothing I say will reach you.

EDIT: just a side note .. somebody reported itsoeasy because of her language ... ???? they are only WORDS for pete sake ... words don't kill people... words don't cause the death of toddlers who find them in bedside drawers.. WORDS offend you BUT yet you all get so bloody pissy when somebody tries to control gun ownership .. WHAT ABOUT THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH ?

and I guess Ms Schlonky got reported too ?? how silly ...

2007-11-30 22:01:20 · answer #4 · answered by ll_jenny_ll here AND I'M BAC 7 · 1 1

The Founders gave us the Second Amendment to protect us from some of the criminals now in office. If you were guilty of some of the things they had done, you would fear an armed populace, too. Honest politicians look at an armed citizenry as an asset for national defense. Criminal politicians fear an armed citizenry that they are trying to enslave.

2007-11-30 14:16:14 · answer #5 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 1 0

Our Government can't keep stealing like they have been,and controlling every aspect of our personal lives, with out a few of us catching on to them.They are afraid that a "Well Regulated Militia "may make a resurgence in the 20th century.If we are armed then the Big Brother New world Order plan won't go so smoothly for them.I agree they are trying to cover there crooked asses.

2007-11-30 13:24:09 · answer #6 · answered by Hillarys lovehandles 4 · 1 1

I have never understood why some people think that criminals who don't obey current laws would suddenly obey
new gun-control laws.
In Nazi Germany, an unarmed population was helpless to stop the abduction and murder of 6 million + people, the government having banned guns and seized all the weapons
that could be found.
"If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns"

:-o

2007-11-30 13:24:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I say that people should have the right to guns. Its not like criminals are going to go through the 30 day wait period and register their weapon so that they can rob a bank or something. Guns are not evil only the people who use them. It's the dumb politicians who say "The gun kills and is therefore, bad" when its the jerk shooting it who is evil. I have to agree with my grandparents opinion that a shotgun in someones face is the best burgler alarm.

2007-11-30 13:53:38 · answer #8 · answered by Zero 1 · 1 1

Hmmm.. I've never heard anybody run on "I want take away your guns".. Have you really? Cause I'd like to see the link..

Most favor keeping the current laws intact.. Gun restrictions, like Rudy said in the most recent debate.. We can't let every loony ex-con run around with a shotgun.. That's just plain stupid.. People do get out of jail ya know... And some people are just plain unstable... They shouldn't have any weapon.. Everybody else is fine with me..

2007-11-30 13:24:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I think the gov. is fearing an uprise and covering their butts. While I am against guns personally I think we should have the right to own one, but they really need stricter screening on them and ammo, too many irresponsible people have them for the wrong reasons.

2007-11-30 13:16:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers