No, "Save a Fetus" would be more appropriate.
They disown the baby the second it's born and they become the responsibility of those dreaded Democrats with their "socialist" programs like healthcare and education.
2007-11-30 12:16:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alex G 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
No it wouldn't. The Babies that they're trying to "save", are likely to grow up poor, and the republicans despise poor people. Evidently feeding the babies of poor people is a poor use of their taxes, and so is medical care for them. So really by voting Republican you are starving poor sick babies to death.
How about I let you in on a secret: Democrats aren't forcing abortions on anyone. We just don't think the Federal Government has any business telling women what they can or can't do with their vaginas. It's a medical decision, and an ethical one. If you want to know something about ethics or medicine, don't ask politicians. They don't know either of those things. Ask doctors- doctors are very careful with both.
If you'd really like to bring down the number of abortions, start by lowering the number of unwanted pregnancies. Make contraceptives easily obtainable for minors. Educate them. We as a society have thoroughly tried "not talking about it", and it's time to admit that this policy is a failure. Kids who've wisely decided to remain abstinent will do so whether or not there are condoms around. But for those who've decided to explore sex, lets give them a chance to make better informed decisions.
2007-11-30 20:18:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Beardog 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Nope. I'm a democrat and pro-life.
Republican and Democrat are not divided black and white. Many of the issues and morals overlap, regardless of what the media would try and have us believe.
I did vote for Bush in 2000 because of his pro-life stance. However, he never touched the issue again until 2004, and then he used it to point fingers at the Democrats to call us baby killers. Since then, again, he hasn't done a thing with the issue of pro-life.
2007-11-30 20:16:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by thezaylady 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Today? No..
10 years ago? No..
20 years ago? No..
How many elections should I go back in time? They'll never make abortion illegal.. They only make it an issue before the election to get more votes..
Edit: It's a non-issue.. A vote for a republican will do NOTHING as proven time and time again..
2007-11-30 20:16:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
...it would be a stupid one! voting republican doesn't save the life of a baby automatically. i mean really...
there are republicans out there who are pro-choice just as there are democrats who are pro-life. so it's just dumb to make a wild statement like that.
2007-11-30 20:13:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by diving into life 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
Would somebody tell "bill" that there is no draft, and that the only reason that we have soldiers that die for our freedoms is because of mothers that actually gave birth to them.
2007-11-30 20:17:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ancient Warrior DogueDe Bordeaux 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Save a young adult, and vote against Bush's personal war, is
more like it.
:-o
2007-11-30 20:16:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
No because when it comes to politics, people have big ideas about what other people should do in certain situations...but when it happens to them, it's a different story....
But yeah, I agree----more babies = more soldiers, unfortunately
2007-11-30 20:16:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Hope they kill all their babies and then we can teach our children the RRRRRRRRRRight way to do things.
2007-11-30 20:29:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Evil Conservative Man 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, because the baby might die of a horrible disease without health coverage.
2007-11-30 20:17:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Zardoz 7
·
2⤊
3⤋