English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

21 answers

I would do what is right..

2007-11-30 11:31:04 · answer #1 · answered by north h 3 · 5 0

despite the fact that cuts government has to evaluate in time of recession, it is going to maintain the Royal army's shipbuilding programme intact, consisting of the two new plane cariers, as this ensures the way forward for what little shipbuilding means we've left in Britain. The stupid decision of a prior Labour gov't to cancel new distributors interior the 1960's meant that there ws an prolonged era interior the 1970's the place Britain had no plane distributors in any respect, and had basically merely have been given the 1st of a clean era into provider in 1982. with out them, we does not have kicked the Argies off the Falklands. And Britain has slumped to 5th best army interior the international, i'm afraid. the Russians exceed us, of direction (basically to be estimated). After that, gut instinct and British delight says we could constantly be third-best. yet we are actually not. Shamefully, we've a smaller army than our previous WW2 enemy, Japan. (How did we enable this take place!) And those days, the French, of all countries, surpassed us in naval potential. this form of sticks interior the throat and is very stressful, given which ecu us of a we've spent longest at conflict with and whom we discover, with stable reason, not elementary to have faith. by utilising the way, the elementary marketplace is SOCIALIST??? ... you study soemthing new daily. i assumed it became basically a crafty way for the French to tear all of us else off by utilising, between different issues, insisting we conform to idiotic rules which they themselves have no purpose of obeying

2016-11-13 02:28:09 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Huh? Insurgents are people that are trying to overthrow the existing government. That's not defending. Yes I would first fight for my and mine. Then the USA.

2007-11-30 11:34:27 · answer #3 · answered by WooleyBooley again 7 · 2 0

I would fight for both- I would never want my country to become another Palestine or Iraq.
As much as I abhore some of our politics and ethnocentricity, noone has the right to oppress others. I would proudly stand on the frontlines to defend the people of my country.

2007-11-30 11:34:30 · answer #4 · answered by :) 6 · 2 0

I personally am so anti-war that I would run away to another country that is not at war.

I hate that our President feels the need to encourage racial hatred toward Middle Easterners with this war on terror focusing only on the Middle East and of that group, we as a country, are targetting Muslims. It's not fair. I am almost ashamed to be an American with the way our country has been governed for the last 7 years!

For all of you who don't know:

in·sur·gent /ɪnˈsɜrdʒənt/ [in-sur-juhnt]
–noun 1. a person who rises in forcible opposition to lawful authority, esp. a person who engages in armed resistance to a government or to the execution of its laws; rebel.

What are the Iraqi people really doing in Iraq? They are fighting against invaders who had no right or solid reason to invade! They are fighting for the preservation of a government they cared about before we(the USA) rushed in to help the minority take over a country. Most people don't realize that the UNited States are the bad guys in the War in Iraq. Yes, Saddam Huessein did some awful things, but the majority of the Iraq did not want to fight against him. Our government invaded because we thought they had WMDs, which was false. We took them over, they were no major threat to us! Yes, some powerful people in their country may have indirectly funded some of the terrorists of 9/11, but does that mean we take the entire country out? Or should we have hunted for those few people? We as a country are wrong about this one and I can only hope that people will realize it and stand up for the Patriot Act, "...That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government..." Are we not being destructive? Should we not get Bush out of power according to our own Patriot Act?

2007-11-30 11:33:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Man, bump this country. Me and my family would be in Canada SO quick!!! Label me an insurgent if you wish, I don't like American government enough to fight for it!

2007-11-30 12:00:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I would protect my family above all others but, I would also be fighting for the preservation of my country by the same act.

2007-11-30 11:31:39 · answer #7 · answered by Darin C 7 · 4 0

I think that the best place for my family is here, so fighting for my country would also be fighting for them. If anyone feels that this is not a good place to live, feel free to leave anytime, either Canada or Mexico are easy to get to.

2007-11-30 11:36:12 · answer #8 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 3 2

Label me what you will, I would fight for the survival of myself and my family. I pay taxes so that the military can fight for the states.

2007-11-30 11:31:45 · answer #9 · answered by Whyruafraid? 4 · 1 3

Its so funny majority of white Americans would fight for this country.I would fight for family and friends!

2007-11-30 13:52:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I think your labeling yourself as one by asking these bogus questions.. IF you even have to think about that one; you don't deserve to be here! Go F yourself!

2007-11-30 11:33:46 · answer #11 · answered by Rosinbagger 3 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers