2007-11-30 11:16:08 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
(the economist
2007-11-30 12:12:23 · update #1
(the economist)
2007-11-30 12:12:57 · update #2
Mostly supine.
Edit: since you didn't really get a decent response from any of us, I figure I'll sacrifice some of the hilarity of my previous answer to help you out.
Smith didn't really have any views of women, as funny as it sounds. It wasn't until John Stewart Mill came about a few decades later that women were given a prominent place in contemporary political theory.
Smith was into the self-regulating market and its ability to create wealth. However, he never makes any mention of women in the market. It's this omission that makes his views of women clear - they are to stay in the home and support their husbands.
If you're writing a paper on this, it'll probably be quite tricky. You may wish to consider contrasting Smith with John Stewart Mill. Good luck.
2007-11-30 11:19:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since he was alive during the 1700s, I'm sure his were the same as most men at that time. Women should be invisible, take care of the house and children.
2007-11-30 11:22:38 · answer #2 · answered by Frosty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He had the hots for Catwoman.
I liked Batgirl myself.
2007-11-30 11:28:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋