A few people on here have argued in favour of military action to save our teacher.
Let's do it. She will be out in 8 days, so we have a week to assemble an invasion force, get to Sudan, find the prison, and find her head no longer attached to her body in retaliation, and Brits everywhere in the country rounded up into custody.
Doesn't sound so good now, does it?
2007-11-30 10:45:54 · 16 answers · asked by Phil McCracken 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Nuking. So sensible. There will be thousands of brits there, and Sudan has borders with other countries, not to mention the fact that most people there probably don't appreciate their lack of freedom anyway.
2007-11-30 11:09:28 · update #1
Once the U.N. gets involved they will save her.
Just like they are saving the people of Darfur.
2007-11-30 12:28:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No the best answer is to leave it a week or so until things settle down, then tell the brits in there one by one to leave so no one suspects anything , then get a nuke from faslane (one of the old ones will do, write on it a Gift from mohammed and post it to sudan with a time switch attached .... Then NUKE The ignorant B's
2007-11-30 10:53:44 · answer #2 · answered by dont know much 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
As I have said in answer to another question -
History I could be PC and say that the government is appearing to maintain a discrete distance from events in order not to inflame the situation, whilst pursuing all diplomatic means possible to resolve things, a bit like the swan scenario, all calm and serene on the surface but paddling like f**k underneath.
But hey, this is Friday night. I'm bored and had a few tipples of wine.
Gun boat diplomacy. That's what I say. Should never have given up the Empire then this sort of nonsense wouldn't be happening. Bring back General Gordon. He would have known what to do. A couple of battalions of Red Coats, complete with Pith Helmets and bayonets. That would have sorted them out. They don't like it up 'em Sir.
2007-11-30 11:01:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
militia action by using the UN, confident however the U. S. shouldn't make contributions workers or money, the ecu international locations would desire to stand up and rectify a project that they are partly in charge for, besides the undeniable fact that scaling down the inhabitants might remedy lots of the foodstuff scarcity problems.
2016-09-30 08:38:23 · answer #4 · answered by edgmon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't panic,its all sorted.Our cousins across the pond are going to lend us John Rambo.In fact he will be landing at Brize Norton in a couple of hours for a briefing.Then hes off to kick-***.
2007-11-30 10:55:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bring back Gordon? The Sudanese cut his head off!!! But yes his successors battled and defeated the radicals...which kicked off the radical Muslim anti-western movement that is with us today according to the academics. So may be it's not such a good idea!!! Better to be PC :-)
2007-11-30 11:46:41 · answer #6 · answered by lunatic_asylum_seeker 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Definitely
2007-11-30 10:51:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I know she had the best intentions of helping out but when you go into another culture you should study long and hard about the culture before you jump in gung ho...
2007-11-30 11:57:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If they wanted to get her out, they could be a lot quicker. They have satellites pinpointing anything that interests them, and can have men in the area within hours. Funny how they didn't get Bin Laden, eh?
2007-11-30 10:55:17 · answer #9 · answered by Heidi W 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No but we can do it another way.... It is their cake.... they can eatit if they choose to but If they hurt her, then in RETALLIATION we light the candles on their cake !!!
Now that sounds much more appetizing sonny !?
2007-11-30 10:54:37 · answer #10 · answered by RED-CHROME 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋