2007-11-30 10:45:28 · 15 answers · asked by Guysshortyssk8 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
There were some bad calls, but I don't think it woul dhave mattered. Dallas would have and should have beat them by more. For God sakes it was 27-10 at half!! Deion Sanders saied it perfeclty last night Dallas is a good team but they dont put teams away. They let teams hang around and get soft on Defense when they have a big lead. The PAtriots on the other hand could be winning 50-0 and it wouldnt be good enough in bellicheats eyes. They go for the kill nad destroy teams and dont allow them back in the game .
2007-11-30 11:24:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know if I'd say I blame the refs for the outcome of the game, but that pass interference call against the Packers was bogus and everyone in Dallas that knows anything about football knows it was, and knows they got away with it. That COULD have been a huge game changing moment. I never like saying the officiating changed the outcome of the game, but the officiating in that game was HORRIBLE.
The NFL really needs to get a handle on this. I don't think I've ever seen so many games that the refs called so one way.
For the record I'm not a Packers fan or a Cowboys fan.
2007-11-30 11:17:16 · answer #2 · answered by joecon113 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i dont blame the refs for the packers losing because if you watched the game the cowboys were the better team. i thought a few calls were blown that changed momentum. the first one obviously being the pass interference call that spotted the cowboys at the 3 yard line. now i know that the packers db did have his hand on Myles Austin for a second but in my opinion that had little outcome on the actual play itself. i thought that they tangled their feet together and that is what cause Austin to trip. but i dont have a problem with that so much. The one that they really blew was on the Cowboys first drive. Al Harris stripped that ball away from T.O. while in bounds. that was a blown called that led to a field goal. That is one that i had a huge problem with. they blew that one. But lets face it why would the NFL put a Head Official out there to call one of the biggest games of the year when it is his first year with that position. Another problem i have is that the officials have other jobs during the workweek. are you telling me the NFL cant afford to pay these officials decent amount of money so that this would be their only profession and just concentrate on it. that is the true crime. sorry this was so long. just needed to vent.
2007-11-30 11:07:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't. I did see one blatantly bad call.......(the interception that got given back to the Boys), but that was really the only one I remember. I would have prefered for the Pack to win...but even before his injury Brett made 1 blatantly bad interception, and had at least two other hail mary's that should have bit him in the butt. I don't know if it was game plan, or if Brett was just trying too hard to finally get a win in Texas. Either way, unless they made hi calm down before the second half, I think it actually would have been worse for the Packers had he kept playing.
That said, I think Rodgers and the Pack did a good job staying in the game after.....with those two picks essentially gift wrapping 2 TDs for the Boys, and the Pack mysteriously putting zero pressure on Romo...I would have expected a blowout at that point.
But the Pack lost cause of bad game plan, mixed with injuries, Period. Whether they could have won will always only be speculation, and I hope we get to see a rematch for the NFC title. Aside from Bretts' injury it was still a good game to watch!
2007-11-30 10:55:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont and Im not a packers fan, but I do hate the cowboys more than my ex-girlfriend.
That was an interception that Harris made and one official signaled Green Bay's ball and the other ref signaled completion. It was not challengable though.
2007-11-30 11:13:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyone who doesn't think there were bad calls doesn't know the rules:
1) Harris stripping TO was Packers ball, no question about it. Harris had the ball and 2 feet in bounds.
2)pass interference on GB when their legs got tangled is a no call... both players where looking for the ball
3) a Dallas CB face guarded a Packer WR near endzone without looking for the ball, which is a penalty.
all were LONG penalties or change of position situations, and could have impacted the game hugely.
2007-11-30 11:01:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
If something, referees harm Boston interior the sequence. First, they robbed Ray Allen of interest a million with stupid fouls. Then Garnett early in interest 2. All there enormous adult adult males have been in foul difficulty which helped the Lakers enormous adult adult males. there have been additionally multiple unfair calls on Boston and that i'm lazy to call them. you already know if youve watched the interest.
2016-10-02 05:24:25 · answer #7 · answered by deems 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes there were some questionable calls that favored the hometown Cowboys. But in almost every game there are some questionable calls.
2007-11-30 10:57:14 · answer #8 · answered by mikea_va 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
cant blame the refs for a good win the packers jsut werent the bettter team plain and simple
2007-11-30 10:53:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Seeing as how I have neither cable nor dish I missed the entire game.
2007-11-30 10:53:12 · answer #10 · answered by ziggy_brat 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋