The only angle that matters in that case is the top-down shot. It clearly showed NO white space between the goal line and the puck. Thus, it had NOT crossed the line.
The front angle was USELESS, as you will see white space if the puck is tilted up, even if the puck has not fully crossed the line yet.
FIRE THE WHOLE WAR ROOM!
2007-11-30 10:43:16 · 6 answers · asked by Bill W 【ツ】 6 in Sports ➔ Hockey
I totally agree it was not in. It seems like the refs are letting in more and more goals that shouldn't be in and waiving off goals that are in. Or sometimes blowing the whistle way to fast and canceling a goal. Just like in 2004 when the Flames won the Stanley cup, that goal was in.
2007-11-30 15:32:59 · answer #1 · answered by Flames Girl 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Get over it!Sometimes it goes your way sometimes it doesn't. I've seen goals which should have been goals waved off!
I watched it from several angles. It was in. It doesn't matter really b/c they won 4-1 . Tell the Flames to score more goals if they want to win.
2007-11-30 19:00:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I can't help but agree with your question ;-(
Sure stuff happens when decisions are made but grrrr.
Whatever happened to the more-than-halfapuck-in thebluepaint-thing, or amIjustmessedup?
2007-11-30 19:12:38 · answer #3 · answered by SHE_ROWDY 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
On TSN they showed the replay and I could see white.....and I'm 66 yrs old!
2007-11-30 21:40:20 · answer #4 · answered by Like I'm Telling You Who I A 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah! What is the point of video replay if they don't use it???
2007-11-30 23:30:13 · answer #5 · answered by I don't know 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
LOL @ LITY
And he wasn't using his glasses either!
2007-11-30 21:52:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋