It isn't Roy. You are telling lies again. But you don't understand numbers. You keep telling us that 520 votes in Dukinfield is a great victory. Even when John Taylor (and you keep telling us how clueless he is) polled three times as many votes.
The BNP has never yet managed to convince 1% of the electorate voting in a national election to vote for them. And that's because the British people aren't stupid, and won't vote for a gang of racist thugs.
Another question from BNP plant, Roy West, BNP candidate (failed) in Dukinfield. Roy can't be honest and use just one identity. He has to try to cheat by posting similar questions under multiple identities.
It's funniest when he starts to answer his own questions using one of his other identities.and tells himself how great he is!
You know the routine now, Roy. Violation, then Block User. Free speech the BNP way.
EDIT: Redmonk - stop making things up. We've now established that you've made up this "listening party" nonsense and no-one else calls the racist thugs of the BNP that.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AjjfntEOq4DaG9pJrVtgAZIgBgx.;_ylv=3?qid=20071128104655AABxlqW
And you can't do sums.
If 7% of the electorate were to support BNP (which they don't - they've never yet managed 1% in a national poll); and 'white British' make up 86% of the population (Wikipedia) - you can't possibly claim 30% support among the 'Native Briton'
30% support from 86% of the population would equate to 26% support across the whole population, not 7%
If you're going to make up figures, try to get some arithmetical consistency going.
I think the only way the BNP could win a seat at the next election was if Redmonk was in charge of the count!!
2007-11-30 10:58:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr Sceptic 7
·
9⤊
3⤋
The BNP ARE NOT growing. In actual fact they are currently undergoing an internal crisis where they have virtually run out of money due to incompetent handling of their own finances. They would in fact be struggling to field any candidates if there were a general election this year.
Due to this, and a number of other factors, quite a few significant members of the BNP have actually left the party and others are openly speaking out against the BNP leadership. According to recent opinion polls, the BNP's popular support has actually fallen from it's position in the May 2007 local elections (where they made no significant progress from the 2005 general election). The BNP are a party who now can muster significantly less that 1% of the popular vote in national elections.
So if this is your idea of a party that is growing, then you are either a very deluded individual, or a BNP propagandist attempting to bolster their position by greatly exaggerating their popular support. Typical BNP dishonesty.
2007-12-01 09:05:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spacephantom 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
Well we all know why that is don't we? That's why the BNP are now affectionately known as 'Listening Party'. Why? because that is exactly what they are doing. Listening about immigration, Listening about Europe and above all bent on Democracy and the right of free speech. On top of that Nick Griffin is calling for a completely independent inquiry into fraudulent politicians, Political parties and political practices at all levels.
Whats more Nick has insisted the BNP be first in Line but of course he wants assurances that Labour , Tory and Liberals will be scrutinized at the same level.
If you think 'New Labour's' fraudulent donations are the be all and end all of the corruption in Parliament think again, as I have been pointing out to you all along' 'New Labour' is the most corrupt government we have ever had.
Of course the BNP is growing, people are now able to physically see what is happening to our country. The last statistic I read quoted up to 7% increase but you and I know full well we are looking at around 30% with the Native Britain. As things get worse (and they will) that percentage will steadily rise.
Edit: Sceptic,
Hi Scep, Foot in it again I see,
Why don't you re evaluate the question you asked regardinig 'The Listening Party', You know, telling fibs only goes to make you look foolish. I'm Supprised you put that question up for scrutiny and then tell me I got it wrong. It appears to me that at least three people said yes, and no one actualy said no. Tut Tut.
The thugs are the SWP army that stopped the debate on free speech at Oxford not the BNP. You know, your freinds and the websites you use to expose the BNP, Searchlight etc. 'Trevor Phillips' who only wants free speech if he happens to agree with what is being said.
My Sums, Scep that was a guestimate based on Native Britain not Eastern Europeans or Black communities ( my opinion) not a final account (as an accountant I 'm sure I could have worked out the figures if I needed to).
The 7%, this percentage was given after a recent poll by either the Mail or Guardian.
I'm afraid you will need to adjust to the fact as everyone on this forum has already that the BNP are gaining momentum.
ATB Red
2007-12-01 10:49:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Redmonk 6
·
1⤊
6⤋
Many real British people are sick and tires of foreigners taking over by sheer numbers. The British used to have large families in bygone days. We were adivised and persuaded to cut down as large familys created a drain on all rescourses, took up land for more houses, more cars, more energy needed more land fill etc etc. So what happens? We the real British cut down to an average of 2.4 children, and our sh*t government tell us there are not enough kids around now and let in thousand of immigrants and expect us to keep quiet by making anti-racial laws.
Now many are getting angry but all too late, so many leave for a foreign country as they know its all too late. The rest of us hope that someone will do something but all but the BNP or ukip party are far too weak and afraid to speak out the truth. SO THAT IS ONE REASON WHY but i expect u knew that anyhow
2007-11-30 18:56:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
dissatisfaction with the present government which is unable to grasp the fact that Britons are fed up with the uncontrollable influx of foreign workers. I know they are vital to our economy but it's the ones who come here and live on benefits and jump the housing queue (reverse discrimination!) which in turn makes most people turn against them then the immigrants whine they can't get decent housing and health care etc. Councils have been asking the government for more money to accommodate the influx, schools are swamped by children whose first language is not English. I am not xenophobic but I am getting fed up with the whole sad situation in which we find ourselves ...
2007-11-30 21:35:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by lily 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
If that is a fact then the obvious reason for it is that in England they provide the only alternative to Con, Lab and Lib as people are thoroughly cheesed off with the big three.
This does not apply in Scotland and Wales as we have decent alternatives.
2007-11-30 18:55:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Equaliser. 3
·
4⤊
3⤋
I'm fed up of this. People complaining that Asians come in and steal 'our' work. Then get cushy life styles, and get to live in 'our' space.
That's ridiculous. In the same way people do not persecute against Other races, people do not persecute against British ones.
These people have got better jobs, why? BECAUSE THEY HAVE WORKED FOR IT!! The ones who have come in and are living off state benefits are unable to get work a lot of the time, why? BECAUSE RACISTS REFUSE TO HIRE A POLISH PERSON, OR A BLACK PERSON, OR AN ASIAN!
And when a lot of these people do get work, if they are not in Academic lines, by that I mean doctor, teacher, etc, (Meaning a welders or builder) then they get screwed.
So many people come into this country with the idea that it has potential for them to better themselves, gain money for their family. Allow their children to have a good education and other luxeries a lot of us take for granted (Then complain about not having when we don't work for it). Then people pay them half minimum wage, because their foreign. And any BNP supporters out there who think they deserve it; Would you not be outraged if you went on holiday somewhere and went to pay for your lunch then got charged double what you would see in a top London resteraunt, just because you were foreign? Don't deny it. You would.
And that is exactly parallel to what we are doing to a lot of immegrants now.
Of course there are those who come into this country with the idea that they have a chance to terrorise the western world, or come in the country because they want to scrounge off of our taxes, but this numbr is so small compared to the hard working coming in.
And be honest, how large is the teenage pregnancy rate these days? How many teenagers are failing exams, because they are lazy? How many of them know they won't be bothered to work properly when they're older, and make a living out of reproducing? Trust me, a lot. (I don't mean to offend teenagers, as I am one, but it's true- the facts are there)
Considering how lazy this nation is becoming, are people honestly not finding comfort in the fact that someone is coming in to do the work? If no one works, and we have lazy lay abouts doing a half ar*e job, which a better person could do, are you honestly saying that you would prefere the former doing it, because he/she was British?
In which case, would you rather less Hospitals, and A and E units around the country because they can't find the right staff? Or perhaps you would prefere a person who builds your house to be someone who barely manages to scrape it together than a top worker who will work long hours until it's finished?
I can't honestly believe that BNP and those of you who agree with them would like to know that your house could fall apart any minute. Or you have less chance of getting an Ambulance if you need one.
Britian really needs to clue up on what's in front of them, because if you don't let a lot of these people into this country, we are going to go down the drain.
2007-11-30 19:13:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
5⤋
because when you have only less than 200,000 who voted for you in the past elections its very hard to see how much lower it could get really besides they are not growing very fast at the rate they are growing there would have to be a wait on the election to be in the year 2039
2007-11-30 18:58:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by BUST TO UTOPIA 6
·
5⤊
3⤋
well i don't know what polls your going on but i only saw a tiny increase in the polls in fact so small it would only mean about a 4 thousand votes
2007-11-30 19:09:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Thinking of peace 2
·
4⤊
2⤋
They do say there's one born every minute, so I suppose a few dupes will always join up.
2007-12-01 14:26:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Huh? 7
·
4⤊
1⤋