Which decade was better in terms of political leadership?

Question

the 1990's or the 2000's?

Answer 1

1990s... Clinton kept us out of war.

Answer 2

The best decade in American history in terms of political leadership goes to Lincoln. I would humbly suggest the next great leader was Roosevelt, since winning WWII was no small task.

In both cases, you could argue it was the people, and the troops that made those decades so great.

Both the 1990's and the 2000's are terrible decades in this country's history in my opinion. While I admire how a Democratic president and Republican congress brought some fiscal responsibility in the 1990's, and some success in Bosnia, the way the US ignored Rwanda, and the growing threat of radical islamic terrorists is a sorry black mark on that decade.

On the other hand, Rumsfeld miscalculated in Iraq, to great detriment to our foreign policy strength and the growth of the debt in the past eight years is criminal. We've spent more money in the past few years than we should have, and it was far beyond the cost of the war in Iraq. It was the cost of graft, greed, earmarks and other wasteful spending that doomed this decade to receiving poor marks in terms of leadership.

So my simple answer is neither, both Bill Clinton and George W, will go down as very poor presidents indeed.

The only thing that redeems both decades is how admirably our troops performed in Bosnia and Iraq, and indeed in all their points of service.

Answer 3

The 1990's - we clearly had better political leadership. The Bush Admin. couldn't lead their way out of a paper sack.

Answer 4

The 90's.

Answer 5

Hindus have continuously been a minority in India. What i see are caste and tribe communities and Dalits. no person is Hindu and whilst they do comprehend it it is going to in all likelihood be too late. whilst will they unite as Hindus? The rug may well be pulled from under their ft and destiny generations will curse them for forgoing freedom and surrendering to Islam on a similar time as combating one yet yet another over petty transformations ignoring the actual enemy.. As Hindus progression economically delivery expenditures will decline and we can finally finally end up basically like the west with an unsustainable decadent society by using actuality we carry on with the western style blindly. Europe may well be Islamic in 50 years by using actuality of declining delivery expenditures between the Europeans because of the fact of breakdown of the kinfolk members gadget. For a society and way of existence to maintain itself and characteristic a option element inhabitants there might desire to be atleast 2.3 toddlers in accordance to kinfolk members. In city factors Hindu inhabitants is already in decline by using actuality the economically properly off have fewer and much less toddlers. Muslim delivery expenditures are properly over 7. At this fee Hindus will at present replace precise right into a Demographic minority. a lot greater effective so as muslims try greater effective to marry Hindu women human beings by utilising technique of "Love Jihad". whilst a woman is going out of the fold there is one much less Hindu womb and one greater effective womb working for Islam.

Answer 6

I'd say 90's. Over the past 25 years we have only had one good president, Bill Clinton. George Bush Sr. was an idiot, his son is an idiot, Ronald Reagan was a far too popular idiot.

Answer 7

1820s and 1830s

Answer 8

If I have to choose between the two has to be the 90s.

Answer 9

0030 AD.

Answer 10

Now.