Like what could she change? What would she be for and against ?
2007-11-30 08:46:48 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Depends on which female you are talking about. (if it is Hillary, no, but it has nothing to do with her being a woman)
2007-11-30 08:48:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
If you want an honest opinion - a lot of people in the US may be ready, but I don't think anybody other than an older white man will be president, at least not for the next 20-40 years.
2007-11-30 08:51:51 · answer #2 · answered by AT6381 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
no longer a woman president consistent with se, and not in any respect Hillary Clinton. while you're taken in by using her gender on my own, then you definately are no longer pronounced sufficient to take on the duty of balloting. do no longer purely study their positions on subjects, look on the balloting data that the applicants have held. in case you like somebody who's purely as lots a warmonger as Bush or fairly some the Republicans then i assume you will like Hillary. yet once you like somebody who will end the conflict, has a professional-peace balloting checklist, and by using distinctive function of his professional experience (as an ob/gyn well-being care professional) has cared approximately ladies. i opt to propose Ron Paul.
2016-10-18 10:15:22 · answer #3 · answered by layden 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will be a woman that is like the men politicians that don't ever do anything. It should be one that wants to change the entire constitution and then actually does it in her term.
Then she should go as far as banning all scantily clad women and men from television and internet.
Then she should also impose thousand dollar a minute fines on car companies that don't get their green air vehicles off the road and get ones there that are solar powered.
2007-11-30 08:53:09 · answer #4 · answered by littleblanket 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
What does one's gender have to do with it? A well educated woman with the right experience and connections should be able to run for President and possibly win. She could handle the job as well as some of her male counterparts and better than others.
2007-11-30 08:50:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
It depends on the female. Hillary Clinton would be a very different female president than, say, Condi Rice. I think we are ready for Condi based on what I know of her politics, vision and values.
However, I don't think we will ever be ready for Hillary. I just don't agree with her politics, her vision or her values.
2007-11-30 08:50:15 · answer #6 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
A female? Maybe. The one thats running, hell no. We can't afford her. A generic female president would be O.K w me; as long as she is actually qualified and brings real ideas to the table, not just activist talking points.
2007-11-30 09:02:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
YES!!! And her name is Hillary! Research Female Presidents. We as a country are way behind. Women around the world are & have been leaders for a long time and doing very well.
2007-11-30 08:51:47 · answer #8 · answered by dtown 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Yes, but Hillary is NOT it. We need a woman in the mold of Margaret Thatcher. I like Condi Rice and would vote for her if she ran for President.
2007-11-30 08:51:18 · answer #9 · answered by Dude 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think the problem with a female pres. is that some women can be very emotional. As long is it is the right kind of woman.
2007-11-30 08:51:43 · answer #10 · answered by Rosa Lee 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
1 - Yes (but not the one who's running this time.
2 - Whatever she could change.
3 - The things she's for and against.
2007-11-30 08:49:31 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋