English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-30 08:19:31 · 13 answers · asked by realitycheck 3 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

CNN is totally planned and planted.
I Cr 13;8a

2007-11-30 18:47:15 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

Funny how the libs are telling the cons not to cry. If it happened to them, the only thing that would keep them from crying is the fact that they ran out of tear from all the other crying they do. Those cries would be echoed through the NY Times, CNBC, and just about every other news network. Including CNN. It wouldn't bother me so much if the dems had the stones to go on Fox news for their debates, but they don't. I guess they're afraid Fox would do the same thing to them. The untrustworthy are always the most distrustful.

2007-11-30 08:36:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

They have lost whatever small amount of credibility they had. This rivals the CBS / Dan Rather / Bush's military record disaster.
How can any clear thinking individual ever again claim that CNN doesn't have an agenda favoring Democrats?

2007-11-30 09:27:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You can not seriously ask this question with out acknowledging that Fox News does not deliver a sliver of actual news without any bias at all... it is an opinion channel, and they are all far right opinions.

Its funny that people always jump on CNN and the "mainstream" media for having this lefty slant when it is really a case of the accusers being uncomfortable with the truth, and pining for more FOX "News" Channel flagrant bias and opinions being passed off as news. Remember, just because Hannity or Limbaugh say it on air, it is still just their demagogic voice and not factual.

2007-11-30 08:29:11 · answer #4 · answered by BROOOOOKLYN 5 · 4 1

ALL Television NEWS is ENTERTAINMENT.... and if you think otherwise, you're cruisin for a disappointment.

CNN, FOX, MSNBC have all had their share of stupidity over the years....

among which are:
forcing people to digest more Britney
" " Paris Hilton
" " playing partisan politics instead of giving facts.
"Questioning" Global Warming instead of it's actual solutions.
Promoting the Agendas of extremists for ratings.
"Reality" television
Selling "globalization" to Americans without informing them that it means giving up their jobs.

Advertisers want to keep you:
A) Entertained
B) Stupid
C) Buying things to feel better about your sad life in front of the television.

See the cycle?

If you really want to know what your congressman is doing, pick up a paper, listen to NPR or watch CSPAN.

2007-11-30 08:26:28 · answer #5 · answered by rabble rouser 6 · 2 1

Oh give me a break, just like my man Keith Olbermann said last night, "If you can't take the heat from a democrat in the audience, how are you going to stand up against Al Queda?"
What a bunch of babies!

2007-11-30 08:30:24 · answer #6 · answered by MadLibs 6 · 2 1

God forbid, a Republican candidate should answer a question posed by either a Democrat or a Hillary supporter.
If that is beyond their capacity, good luck with being Head of State.

2007-11-30 08:27:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I think you have CNN mixed up with the Fox News.... thats the plantd news network.

2007-11-30 08:44:50 · answer #8 · answered by F.U. BUDDY 4 · 1 1

No. Tough talking neo-cons should not fear a tough question. Tim Russert gave the Dem candidates a thorough workout and you did not see them crying about it.

Is there any cheese to go with that whine?

2007-11-30 08:22:48 · answer #9 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 7 1

Planted or not, it was still a valid question.

2007-11-30 08:28:40 · answer #10 · answered by czekoskwigel 5 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers