She would not need Dick Cheney to hold her hand. She is light years smarter than W.
2007-11-30
07:54:52
·
30 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
She is a 'socialism' pure and simple? And I am the one whose intelligence is suspect? She is not a socialists. She is a moderate Democrat if one has followed her senate career. She has been a strong supporter of the war in Iraq, to her political grief among other Democrats. She favors universal health care. What is wrong with providing millions of Americans with that. We want to save the unborn, why not save the born as well?
2007-11-30
08:01:16 ·
update #1
Some of these folks are off the deep end. 'Uppity women'? Damn those women who want equal rights and the chance to vote.
2007-11-30
08:22:27 ·
update #2
What's the deal with the new trend of not supporting the President? Most of these people probably don't even vote.
2007-11-30 08:00:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It's because she reminds them of Nixon, and they felt betrayed and embarrassed for having supported someone who was actually a conniving, lying, dirty tricks and backroom politics type politician who would say and do anything to get elected and have people like him in public, yet he was a manipulative control freak who would use any means necessary to quietly destroy his enemies in secret.
Hillary is the Democrat's version of Nixon, 1000%. She pulls all the same dirty tricks and is even MORE of a manipulative control freak than even he was.
If she gets elected, the people who are going to suffer the most are the ones who helped get her there. She has already said the middle class isn't paying enough of their "fair share" (e.g. high taxes) for the war and everything else that needs to get done, and she has made it clear that she would not withdraw troops from the middle east. So, you'll have a continuance of the Bush policies PLUS higher taxes PLUS a potential military draft, because she definitely wants the legacy of a wartime president that was denied to Bill.
She has said that will do everything she can to enact the socialist utopia that her hippie generation dreamed of. She is their last chance to change the country into that fantasy, and with a Democrat majority in Congress, she can make it happen.
And as a member of the hippie generation, who are about to retire in HUGE numbers like this country has never experienced before, she will ensure that YOU pay for the wealthy retirement that was promised to all of THEM. Never forget, she is representative of the "ME" generation. And that means YOU are the means to get HER what SHE wants.
2007-11-30 08:27:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
before each thing- She'd not in any respect be elected. examine out who she's operating antagonistic to. wide-spread rationalization why she isn't elected- She's a woman, she remains married to bill (the Fox- love him) whom cheated on her and maximum lady imagine she's susceptible for it, she change right into a legal professional in AK doing some debatable stuff, she will probable run into campaign financing subject matters and he or she has a mediocre record contained in the Senate. in words of her being better efficient than Bush user-friendly, (user-friendly on brains and on flavor), a monkey in a clown tournament might want to have finished a better efficient pastime (or might want to do a better efficient pastime). the priority with the undesirable soul voted into workplace in 2008 is that he/she/it would want to ought to undo each thing Bush has finished. meaning reforming tax (which thankfully congress will do in 2010 with the aid of sundown provision), Medicare/medicaid, social protection, well being and tort subject matters, anti-monopoly reform and a touch tiny difficulty we so swiftly determined on pursuing in a small oil wealthy area of the international. So- herein lay the priority- Bush change into/is type of a tsunami, yet they on occasion carry wonder waves that do not strike till they're some distance away- yet maximum folk will see those waves as led to by ability of the recent president- so in a way- Bush has effectively decreased the efficacy of the democrats in workplace. Blah!
2016-10-25 05:31:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont like her because she seems to say whatever the crowd she is speaking to wants to hear, and she tends to have very liberal views based on things she has actually tried to do as a public servant. She is also extremely mean, arrogant and condescending. She seems to believe the hype that she is some kind of super woman who can accomplish anything. When she talks about how she will handle Iran by just sitting down and talking with them, the arrogance of that just amazes me. After 2000 years of fighting, Hillary is here to save the day. Ridiculous.
I STRONGLY disagree with your charectrerization of her being a moderate. She tries to make people believe that because she knows that otherwise she will never get elected. National healthcare is not a moderate position! sorry. The many reasons why national healthcare is a terrible idea can be left for another time. Republicans are against it not because we dont want everyone to get healthcare, but because it will be a disaster as illustrated by the shortage in vaccines caused by Hillary's little plan to have every child vaccinated courtesy of the Fed govt.
2007-11-30 07:58:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
She's an "uppity woman" She does not know her place in society and thus threatens the social order and therefore the social stability of the nation. Without this social stability there can be no order=>ethics=>morality. Without morality, we are just like everyone else; our superiority is suspect. This will call God's wrath down upon us. Better to bear false witness against this social deviant (along with homosexuals, the homeless, and illegal immigrants) than to risk God's punishment. (insert appropriate scripture references: Noah, Babel, Job, Sodom & Gomorrah, Jonah and the whale)
2007-11-30 08:15:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
you nailed the exact reasons why...the perception you illustrate is one that is manufactured and force fed on everyone ..
there is absolutely no proof of what you have submitted as true..
all we get is what is presented from advance staffing and people building her image..and doing it at our expense
if she is so smart ..how did she go down in flames on her Nat'l Health care to the point she never again promoted one single initiative and was silenced in her husband's administration?..she has done nothing but follow a path a shrewd politician would follow..not the one of a visionary.
2007-11-30 08:02:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
More taxes
gut the military
national health insurance: no is not an option.
More taxes
bloated central government
she was married to Bill BJ Clinton.I know they are still "married" VERY strange marriage indeed.
Need more?
2007-11-30 08:00:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hilary has a hideous birth defect. It's called a vagina.
It seems that an awful lot of Americans think that the 'executive branch' is just a slang for the President's penis.
2007-11-30 09:53:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I see little difference between Hillery and Bush. Both self-serving liars with similar goal of selling off the United States for their own profit.
2007-11-30 07:59:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
It is not that. If she falls out of the lead they will harass the new leader. It is just the fact she is a Democrat.
2007-11-30 07:59:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋