Is "Bluest Eye" a tough read?
I have a paper due in less than 5 days. I can write on Dracula, but I have so much trouble interpreting it and all the themes and everything (I guess I just find it hard, plus it's so long).
I can also write on Morrison's Bluest Eye, but I'll have to read it first, and seeing as it's 200 pages long, I don't know if I can do it in time.
So can someone tell me if Bluest Eye was easier or harder to read than Dracula? And which is more difficult to write a paper on?
2007-11-30
06:11:09
·
4 answers
·
asked by
lcharrison95
1
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Books & Authors
To bards:
I appreciate your reply and all the personal insults on my intelligence but it actually doesn't help me. Surprise?
Its amazing how being good at one particular field can turn some people into total b****es who need to belittle others to feel good. It's actually pretty childish (speaking of "maturity" right?).
To aida:
Yes I forgot about the paper topics. Basically I need to write about either logocentrism (speech > writing) or mediated desire. These two topics are very easily seen in Dracula, but the hard part is coming up with a greater argument about them (I can't just simply point them out). I think I may just try to read Bluest Eye if I'm still at a dead end with Dracula by tomorrow.
2007-11-30
21:10:59 ·
update #1