English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

mixing guns with god, being super though on crime, that women should dress conservatively, that men should lead and women should follow, and believes western pop culture is leading to social decay,

how is that group NOT right-wing?

That's what the islamic fundamentalists in the middle east stand for.

They certainly don't stand for a live and let live attitude on social issues like liberals do.

2007-11-30 04:28:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Let's not forget the idea of secular government.

2007-11-30 04:31:36 · update #1

congress,

Al Queda and other terrorist groups officially endorsed Bush in 2004 because they knew nobody could incite the muslim masses more than he could.

The left does not support the far right. The far right in America, which includes neo-nazi organizations supports the far right islamic fundamentalists groups.

They share a hatred of jews.

The vast majority of jews by the way vote Democrat.

Google it. You will find the connections.

2007-11-30 04:38:42 · update #2

10 answers

Hmmmmm Why do you hate freedom?

2007-11-30 04:33:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

"mixing guns with god, being super though on crime, that women should dress conservatively, that men should lead and women should follow, and believes western pop culture is leading to social decay,"

Sounds like fundamentalist Islam to me.

A big impediment to peace in that regeon is fundamentalist Judaism. See Deuteronomy 2;34-35 to find out what I mean. If I were an Arab living in a land claimed by Israel, I would be VERY afraid.

2007-11-30 04:31:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

• That foremost among the transcendent values is the individual's use of his God-given free will, whence derives his right to be free from the restrictions of arbitrary force;

• That liberty is indivisible, and that political freedom cannot long exist without economic freedom;

• That the purpose of government is to protect those freedoms through the preservation of internal order, the provision of national defense, and the administration of justice;

• That when government ventures beyond these rightful functions, it accumulates power, which tends to diminish order and liberty;

• That the Constitution of the United States is the best arrangement yet devised for empowering government to fulfill its proper role, while restraining it from the concentration and abuse of power;

• That the genius of the Constitution—the division of powers—is summed up in the clause that reserves primacy to the several states, or to the people, in those spheres not specifically delegated to the Federal government;

• That the market economy, allocating resources by the free play of supply and demand, is the single economic system compatible with the requirements of personal freedom and constitutional government, and that it is at the same time the most productive supplier of human needs;

• That when government interferes with the work of the market economy, it tends to reduce the moral and physical strength of the nation; that when it takes from one man to bestow on another, it diminishes the incentive of the first, the integrity of the second, and the moral autonomy of both;

• That we will be free only so long as the national sovereignty of the United States is secure; that history shows periods of freedom are rare, and can exist only when free citizens concertedly defend their rights against all enemies;

• That the forces of international Communism are, at present, the greatest single threat to these liberties;

• That the United States should stress victory over, rather than coexistance with, this menace; and

• That American foreign policy must be judged by this criterion: does it serve the just interests of the United States?

2007-11-30 04:36:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

seem, I'm a liberal, professional-homosexual rights, feminist who's virtually atheist and such as you, i do not trust men and women who draw their thought and political affairs from a clergyman or a holy textual content. But evaluating christian conservatives to the federal government in radical Islam countries goes overboard. I grew up in a slight Islam country and there a person might beat up his spouse and children bloody and the police might no not anything approximately it (it is a guy's correct). My buddy grew up in Syria and he tells that during his college no one recognize every others faith in view that speaking approximately faith or politics might get you killed. Christians probably conservatives however you are evaluating them to loopy radicals and asking if they're reverse, the reality that you are going to be alive the next day to learn this publish proves it.

2016-09-05 17:03:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Good point, but it just FEELS so good to try to equate liberals with "Islamofascists," doesn't it?

Liberal Americans don't tend to be as militarily reactive as conservative Americans do. The result is that the conservatives who rely on rhetoric rather than educated debate have a convenient comparison to make, given liberals' notably lower severity of bloodthirst.

Keep in mind though, it's ultimately pretty crazy to draw a reaching comparison between virtually ANY group of U.S. citizens and militant Islamic fundamentalists. As a liberal, I'd much rather live around a bunch of good ole boys who hate me for my beliefs than around aggressive muslims who believe I should actually die because of them.

2007-11-30 04:31:12 · answer #5 · answered by Buying is Voting 7 · 4 1

The family values conservatives in the USA are just like the people you describe. In the US, they think Jesus gives them this right so they believe they are better than everyone else.

2007-11-30 04:32:53 · answer #6 · answered by tanzer360 5 · 4 1

Then explain how most if not all of their support here in the US comes from the left.....and the Terrorists even congratulated the Dems on their victory telling them they hope to work with them.......explain that

PS for those of limited intellect......both EXTREMES hold some simmilar values.....but it is not the right that supports their action...the left has NEVER condemned them for ANY action including blowing up kids in Russia....

2007-11-30 04:35:13 · answer #7 · answered by consrgreat 7 · 0 4

and yet "they " spin it to sound like liberals are friends of the extreme right wing terrorists, when these guys line up with their policies !!!

2007-11-30 04:32:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Oh it's right wing all right.

Just like Ahmadinejad.

2007-11-30 04:32:56 · answer #9 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 4 0

confused?...Scientology may have the answer you seek

2007-11-30 04:49:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers