Here's a hint for you:
SHe's not running against Bush. He's not even running. Defending Hillary by comparing her to Bush is.......well, it just doesn't make sense.
2007-11-30 04:07:34 · 13 answers · asked by Ricky T 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
She uses Bush when she can't answer questions. Have you noticed when she's put on the spot she gets very emotional then starts attacking Bush just to win the audience over? What gullible voters....
2007-11-30 04:11:27 · answer #1 · answered by Stealth 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
You're kidding, right? When was the last time you heard a rightie on the radio talk about a republican candidate without comparing them to Bill and/or Hillary Clinton?
Bush may not be running but his policies are.
2007-11-30 12:14:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No she can't. She cannot stand for herself.
I will never vote for her, but if she does win, she better make sure she's very good or she's going to look like a fool when people realize that she's just as bad or worse than bush.
Yes she can be worse, and there will be worse, and Bush wasn't even the worst president in the country's history.
Too many people are being brainwashed by the media that the Democrats are the answer, when really it is the total opposite.
2007-11-30 12:19:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I don't support Hillary but to me your question is pretty funny, since every time Bush or any republican screws up, you bash Bill Clinton. He has been gone 7 years.
2007-11-30 12:22:06 · answer #4 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Hahahahaha .... after more than seven years of Rove's swiftboating politics now republicans want Hillary to play 'positive politics'?
2007-12-02 00:43:28 · answer #5 · answered by I could care less 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Unfortunately, Democrats seem unable to stand purely upon their own accomplishments and proposals. In order to make themselves appear better, they must tear down at a personal level their opponent with petty schoolyard name calling. Rather than saying "My accomplishments have done this and my plans are better because...", they feel it necessary to call the other guy Hitler, evil, terrorist, or chimp. It's classless and in poor taste. Fortunately for us, they have not yet realized that it contributed (if only slightly) to their defeat in the last 2 Presidential elections.
2007-11-30 12:25:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Her platform is largely made up of attacking the current administration.
The only issues that she really has to go on that don't involve blasting her opponents is in health care, and even then, she seems fond of attacking people.
The election process has gotten very brutal recently. Parties are fighting within themselves. It seems people are no longer running FOR office they're running AGAINST their opponent.
2007-11-30 12:09:57 · answer #7 · answered by Yun 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
it goes both ways. all elections resolve to bashing the past =, present, and future administrations. Stop being narrow minded.
2007-11-30 16:35:08 · answer #8 · answered by timswims 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're right. They should be comparing her to her husband. Which one do you think has the biggest balls?
2007-11-30 12:28:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
are there any that defend her by bashing bush?
i donlt
i like her healthcare platform
and i like her moderate stance on many issues among other reasons i like her as a nominee...
right now she has my vote, but i'm not dead set against reconsidering.
2007-11-30 12:12:47 · answer #10 · answered by sam f 4 · 3⤊ 5⤋