My God, No!
2007-11-30 03:14:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr. Taco 7
·
6⤊
10⤋
No, and that i will proceed to snort, with the aid of very actuality the British pounds and Euros get plenty better effective. Making the greenback a worthless idea interior the minds of human beings. Even OPEC is interior the means of now no longer utilizing money, they are really about like lyra now.
2016-10-25 05:21:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by galustian 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As I have been extremely disappointed with Bush, I would actively campaign against him during the primaries. However, if he made it to the general election, he is still better than all but a handful of democrats.
2007-11-30 03:19:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
I WOULD - If I was ready to see the fall of America, give up my rights as an American citizen, care less what the American dollar is worth, had no interest in what the rest of the world thinks of America, felt like it is time to change our American Heritage, cared little about what happens to the American family, and was ready to turn our country over to any illegal who felt they want to come here, burn our flag, complain about our way of life, march in civil disorder, threaten to overthrow our government; gosh, he would be the best choice to be our president again - but then we don't need him for that; Clinton is trying to get the job and she will do the same thing. Bush will go down in history as our worst present but if Hillary is elected he will only hold the distinction for four years and she will then have it!
2007-11-30 03:48:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dallen B 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
Certainly, he sure has shown how to fix an economy that was left in a shambles...Bring a military back, albeit, not quite where it was before the Clintons got thier hands on it...
Not the best speaker you could ask for, but look at what we had before... I think he's done a wonderful job.
2007-11-30 03:48:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by damond h 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
As much as I loathe Bush I would vote for him to keep Hillary or Obama from turning our country socialist/communist.
2007-11-30 03:26:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lilith 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
It would depend on who was running against him. With The choices we are presented with today. you really don't get to vote for the person that you think will do the most good.
You have to pick the one that you think will do the lest harm
2007-11-30 03:23:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Average Joe 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
I am a staunch conservative, and would not want to vote for him because of his stance on things like immigration and the fact that he didn't do more to reduce spending. That being said I would vote for him as my other choice would be Hillary or OBama.
2007-11-30 03:16:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by IH8TomBrady 3
·
8⤊
2⤋
YES
I'm not sure but I believe he can run a third term technically but not three CONSEQUETIVE terms. If I'm wrong I'm sure someone will be yelling about it. Not that I expect to see him back on the ballots in 2012
2007-11-30 03:15:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Soldier 4
·
6⤊
4⤋
Less than 30% of the populace would.
2007-11-30 03:32:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by zombi86 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
If it was between him and any of the democrats--a resounding YES!!--especially Hilary Cankle Clinton
If it was just in the republican primary-- probably not.
2007-11-30 03:21:20
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋