Because it definitely is. Analyze it for me.
2007-11-30
02:21:38
·
10 answers
·
asked by
ELI
4
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Movies
Here are some of my own answers:
1. the Hollywood version didn't make use of the simple power of silence for an eerie atmosphere. probably thought they had such a huge budget they had to add something to ruin that nuance. Sadako thus gave a more otherworldy portrayal than Samara who just had to be given script. In Ringu, the audience never gets to hear "seven days" when they answer the phone. instead the eerie scratching music is played and we are simply made to understand and imagine that it was said. THAT was smarter filmaking.
2. in the same light, there was WAY too much explicit explanation going on. there was WAY too much SHOWN. And there was too much LIGHT. What built eeriness more in Ringu is what was not shown. Sadako's face is never shown until the very end. her death and origins were not fully explained.
3. Would I be scared of a television image? Samara had to flash and blur as the filmmakers could afford those corny effects. Sadako was there, in her pale flesh.
2007-12-01
15:25:55 ·
update #1