im a giants fan. i bleed blue but heres whats up. the nfc is still such a mediocore conference compared to the afc. the cowboys are no patriots. the packers are no colts.
giants lions cowboys bucs seahawks packers. each team has a leader at qb. and i'd say everyteam is just aboutequal. i dont wanna hear anymore stupid tony romo and cowboy talk. lets talk about one of the 5 teams that'll knock them out.
2007-11-30 01:44:27 · 17 answers · asked by EliManning 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I think the bucs and hawks have a good chance of getting into the NFC champ game.
2007-11-30 02:04:29 · answer #1 · answered by mavsoxhawks 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Giants will have to get much better play from Eli to have a shot at beating the Cowboys in Texas. I don't give the Seahawks, Bucs or Lions a spitting chance at beating the Cowboys in the Playoffs, no way, no how.
The Pack on the other had will give the Cowboys fits. They moved the ball very effectively with Rodgers behind center and I think Favre would do just as well or better if they met in the playoffs.
I think the Cowboys are the clear favorite to win the NFC but the Packers will give them fits if they meet again and the Giants have an outside shot simply because they are playing good defense.. I don't consider any other team viable in the NFC.
2007-11-30 09:56:51 · answer #2 · answered by cowboysfan 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Cowboys aren't *just* Tony Romo. Like him or not TO and his abilities could make any QB look good (Yeah, even Kitna). But the fact that Tony is a good QB makes it easier.
As for who will beat Dallas? None of the remaining teams will beat them. None of the teams have the Defense to pressure Tony, double cover TO while covering the other WR's, and stop the run effectively and repeatedly. I'm not saying they will get trampled over, but good game or no, the Cowboys will still win.
2007-11-30 10:04:36 · answer #3 · answered by Jerry Thunder 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How is not talking about Romo and the Cowboys a realistic NFC conversation? They are the first team to clinch a playoff spot and will, in all likelyhood, have homefield advantage in the playoffs.
and I think saying the Giants have a "leader QB" may be worth an argument in itself.
2007-11-30 09:49:03 · answer #4 · answered by Growler 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Remember how long it took the AFC to beat the NFC in the Super Bowl in the 90s they couldn't even beat anyone in the NFC East at the time it just goes in cycles.AFC has got the better teams now.
2007-11-30 09:51:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think it should be obvious given the results so far that the Boys are hands down the best team in the NFC and will most likely play in the Bowl. However every team can be beaten by any other team (cept maybe Miami) thats why they play the games.
2007-11-30 10:10:53 · answer #6 · answered by mudcreekfarmer 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Realistic conversation?
The Giants are just about equal to the Cowboys?
Have you noticed that the Giants had it handed to them by the Cowboys twice this year?
2007-11-30 10:26:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
who's the giants qb again. lets go to a lil place called earth where everyone knows the giants bucs seahawks and lions dont compare to dallas. and w/ henry and glenn playing niether do the pack and the boys are really comparable to the pats
2007-11-30 09:56:55 · answer #8 · answered by pats suck 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
you cant talk about the best in the nfc without talking about dallas like'em or not they are the best in the nfc followed closly by green bay, the rest you mentioned have to many holes in their game to contend with dallas or green bay, could it happen ....yes the giants could come up big, or tampa or detroit, but if i were to look at it realistically id have to give it to dalls and green bay as the two best after that its mostly medeocre, middle of the pack teams in the nfc
2007-11-30 10:26:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Tampa, they have a proven vet at QB. Solid recievers a aged defense, a quaility runner. The only team to give them a run down the stretch will be GB.
2007-11-30 09:50:13 · answer #10 · answered by ratatatmatt862003 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋