how quick and how easily can they locate the supposed remains of lunar surface missions?
I personally dont believe they landed on the moon, judging by the lies they have told for decades about other things, but I will be happy to apologise if the Japs DO send back photographic evidence.
2007-11-30
00:54:50
·
10 answers
·
asked by
dogzrule
2
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Astronomy & Space
I was looking for help as to whether the probe was able to resolve such small details. A simple "not very" would have done. If I wanted abuse i would have gone into a chat room, I guess with the world full of gullible Mr Andersons, the yankees can do/say what they like. In fact i bet mr Anderson believed that rubbish footage of the "airlplane" hitting the pentagon!! HAHAHA.
Thankyou for the non abusive answers.
Apparently the camera cannot "see" anything smaller than a football field ( thats soccer to our friends over the pond who play a game of throwing and call it FOOTBALL!)
2007-12-02
05:41:30 ·
update #1
I sure there would be some very red faces if no trace was found of a landing. But i would not be surprised if some agreement has not been arranged to not to release the pictures
2007-11-30 01:06:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Leo 7
·
0⤊
6⤋
They can't, because the camera was not designed with the resoluton to identify those objects left behind. Believe it or not it was sent up there to do science, not take nice pictures to show a loud and ignorant minority a bunch of pictures that they won't believe are genuine in the first place.
You want evidence of Apollo's reality, do some research into the program. Look at the development of the space program from simple suborbital flights to lunar missions. Look at the sheer scale of the project, and how many people were involved. Look at the whole visual record, not just the clips that conspiracy nuts rip bleeding from their context and insist are anomalous. In short, go and LEARN about it, don't just wait for some nice pictures from another probe.
2007-11-30 03:43:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jason T 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
The camera on the Japanese probe is not part of the scientific instrumentation. It is basically just a novelty item to snap an occasional picture of earth from the moon. It wasn´t designed to look for Apollo artifacts. It was designed to do SCIENCE. Something the conspiracy nuts seem to ignore constantly.
The Chinese, however, have also put a probe in lunar orbit. They would love to make NASA look bad by photographing the Apollo sites. And I seriously doubt you would ever apologize if the Chinese do take pictures of the Apollo landers. That would require a sense of decency you have proved yourself to be lacking by asking this question in the first place.
2007-11-30 01:37:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by DrAnders_pHd 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
The flat earth society do not believe that the Americans went to the moon.Perhaps they should pitch a tent on the moon and become a lunaticand serh for the site. the Americans went to the moon. But the doubters who have made TV programs etc have done quite well in that they were paid and also knew that the likelihood of someone revisiting the sites was small so they could quow with impunity
2007-11-30 03:31:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by David M 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
And what makes you think the Japanese lunar probe isn't a hoax too?
Actually, the resolution on the Japanese camera is insufficient to see Apollo artifacts.
2007-11-30 01:39:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Keith P 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
People who believe that we didn't land on the Moon are beyond dumb.
Over 400,000 people worked on the NASA programs in the 60's. How could you fool all of them and the Soviet Union too? And, how stupid would it had been, had we faked it, knowing that eventually we would be found out by the whole world when someone went back to the Moon someday, and there was no remnants of the six Apollo landings???
And, Baby Face, How could you be soooo gullible???
2007-11-30 01:09:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Wego The Dog 5
·
7⤊
3⤋
Amazing ! another conspiracy NUT!
I guess landing 6 TIMES--------- returning with moon rocks------- radio communications from the surface of the moon------- everyone on EARTH following the entire event from start to finish in extreme detail-----ELECTRONICALLY with radio transmissions originating from the surface of the moon, and radio telescopes tracking the descent and landings------- thousands of moon site photos----- almost having 3 astronauts DIE (Apollo 13)-------- having astronauts die while testing the capsule on the pad---- redesigning the entire interior of the capsule------ numerous orbital missions ---Gemini-Mercury---- testing procedures and docking------ and a decade of thousands of scientists and workers laboring to achieve this goal ---------- COUNT FOR NOTHING------ and indicate a VAST conspiracy to "pull the wool" over the world's eyes!
http://www.panoramas.dk/moon/mission-apollo.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/masterCatalog.do?sc=1969-059A
http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html
2007-11-30 02:06:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bullseye 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
it will be impossible - the Americans never went to the moon (apart from the unmanned flights)
if they had of done, why don't they say EXACTLY where the sites are - then the Japanese could verify it and stop all the arguments - but they won't will they????
ps he he he!! all the outraged Americans with their false sense of patriotism - if it is true that you landed on the moon, then why not take every chance to prove it? I am not some kind of conspiracy lunatic- in fact I spent 34 years working in the Air Force - and whilst I was taken in at the time - I have since changed my mind - sorry I just don't believe it.
2007-11-30 00:59:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
13⤋
IT NEVER HAPPEND, YOU NOT SEAN THE MOVIE?
2007-11-30 06:49:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by LDS Pete 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
It is impossible because it didn't happen.
WEGO: Seriously, are you for real?? The famous 'one small step for man' hoax? -It DID NOT HAPPEN!! I read up on it and also watched a very lengthy documentary. The whole thing was hilarious. There is not one shred of evidence to suggest it happened but so much to dis-prove it!
2007-11-30 01:02:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by baby_face_paris 6
·
0⤊
12⤋