Gerry McCann witness for the defence in Oldfield negligence charge.?

Question

I have just read that Gerry McCann is a witness for the defence for Dr Oldfield who is facing negligence charge due to
the death of a patient. Could this explain the "pact of silence"
Also, in J. Wilkins original statement he said that when he first saw Gerry, he was doing something to the shutters of the apartment, he told Wilkins that he was checking them. Why was this not mentioned in the Panorama programme?

Answer 1

The plot thickens. Maybe they should start a support group...Neglectors Anonymous.

Btw....has anybody else noticed that up until a few weeks ago, no other adult saw all the kids alive and well past a certain time in the afternoon, then suddenly somebody remembers Gerry asking him to look in on Kate and kids about 6.30 ish while Gerry was busy having a tennis lesson?

Was it Dr Oldfield? Can't remember. It figures though. Another support group springs to mind....Backscratchers Anonymous.....

PS. Given Gerry's track record in the negligence dept, I'm surprised he is considered a reliable witness in the first place, especially by any court he might appear in.

Answer 2

if there is any justice this cutting-edge attempt to sue and suppress info will backfire in this shameful pair they're used to threatening criminal action and raking interior the money whilst the united kingdom papers lower back pedal the portugese policeman they chosen to sue this time has had important dealings with those undesirable people and the ingredient i carry against him is the honor he presented them interior the early days whilst they should have been suspects and MW is sturdy...there's a distinction between leaving a u . s . a . and fleeing one the mccanns left portugal to circulate to italy and u.s. interior the early days whilst the international felt sorry for them and believed their version of activities they fled portugal as quickly with the aid of fact the police began to question their tale and the dogs had smelt loss of life on their outfits and vehicle and blood contained in the place of residing as for no stone unturned.....they refused to respond to questions, demonstrate tips approximately an abduction they declare to have, and did no longer help in a reconstruction: only what stones they're turning over is previous me they dont answer police questions yet have time to respond to those of chat tutor hosts like oprah......kerching lower back i'm hoping the british press get to submit what they actually think of approximately those people....consistent with possibility whilst gordon leaves downing highway

Answer 3

Gerry McCann is a doctor- so it's no surprise he's involved in a case about a patient.

People seem to enjoy thinking of great theories, unsure how anyone can get any enjoyment out of the disappearance of a young child.

Unsure if the McCann's harmed their daughter, but due to the fact there is no strong proof to whether they did or didn't- only tabloid speculation I feel I am in no place to judge.

Answer 4

Go, Trancebabe, GO!
Thank god somebody's out there sleuthing on the slime.
Your question holds a double-whammy....about J. Wilkins, who has remained a mystery to me for so long, but claims he didn't see Tanner coming up the road to notice an 'abductor', and now saw Gerry tampering with the shutter to provide false evidence.......No wonder he has not been elected by the McCanns as a witness on their side.
Thankyou for the information.
We will not let this be forgotten when the McCann team think they're off the hook.

Answer 5

There are a lot of unanswered questions about this case, the statement about Gerry and the shutter is potential dynamite, so cant help wondering why it hasn't been fully explored.

Answer 6

Sparklya.....isn't it funny how nothing the McCanns or their friends get up to is "ever proven"!!!

Answer 7

Good questions ??? Sadly only he or the police have the answers xxxx

Answer 8

Stormy took the words right out of my mouth.

Answer 9

LINK

When any patient dies, suddenly their is an enquiry. The family could be so upset at the death of the patient that they cry "negligence" - Thus far, it has not been proven as such. Yet again, you convict without fact Tranny.



All you want to do is distract attention away from the hunt for Maddy.

You are ILL.

Answer 10

Hi trancebabe, have you got a link at all. They sound a real sleazy lot.