Hillary and obama want to continue the war for at lest 6 more years also
Ron Paul is the only one i believe that when he says he will bring the troops home , he will actually bring the troops home.
2007-11-28 17:43:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
7⤋
Question #1. Why are republicans so wrong about everything?
What is your problem--words like everything covers a lot of territory. Guess you are to young to remember the Cold War and the fact that a Republican--President Regan brought about its end. But maybe you believe he was wrong in making the world safer.
Question #2. Is John McCain a human being?
You state he is the coldest person you have ever seen. If you spent 5 years in a POW camp, were you were beaten 2-3 times a week, having bones broken, not set and broken again time and time again. Having your arms tied behind you and being hoisted up off your feet until your shoulder sockets were pulled out, and having your jaw repeatedly broken----you may find smiling and being light hearted difficult.
Question #3. How could he think that we are winning the war?
The fact is we did win the war. We are currently are in a stabilization operation of the country--trying to prevent mass killing and invasion of the country.
2007-11-29 02:34:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bambi C 2
·
5⤊
1⤋
Okay, did terrorists try TALKING to us before they flew jets into the world trade center? No, I don't think so. Have you been to Iraq and seen it? I highly doubt it, because you can't fathom going to war. You can only criticize it because you are heartless and cowardly.
Vote for Hillary? You have got to be joking! Obama isn't a bad candidate either. But you want to say that John McCain is the coldest person you have ever seen? Hah, he is a seasoned war hero. He knows how to fight and win wars. Sure, after a war a person becomes somewhat cold, because they see both sides to things.
So, instead of starting off with the question, "Why are republicans so wrong about everything?" Think to yourself. How would you like it if I posted a question saying, "Why are democrats considered pansies and why are they cowardly?"
Don't post a question asking why a certain group of people are wrong. People all have different views on things. That is what it is to be an American. You can have different views. Why didn't you just make a racial comment and ask why Jews, Blacks, Mexicans, or Whites are wrong?
2007-11-29 01:53:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rabbit 3
·
5⤊
4⤋
Because you believe different things than these people. If we were all forced to believe the same thing, you wouldn't live in a democracy.
By the way, I can't wait until the primaries are over and I won't have to listen to those intolerant, badly raised Ron Paul zealots boo everything and everyone they disagree with in a public forum and cheer like a bunch of high school cheerleaders if Ron Paul even as much as burps.
You and your buddies need to learn some manners.
2007-11-29 01:48:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by pgb 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
OK let me help you out here...First the Babylonians, Persians, Kurds, Arabs, and Palestinians all hate each other and have hated each other long before there was an Iraq, Iran, Israel, or Palestine. Secondly among those ethnicity's there are Shiites and Sunnis, guess what, they hate each other too. So you've got Arab Shiites killing Arab Sunnis, and Persian Shiites killing Persian Sunnis, and you've got Kurd Shiites killing Palestinian Shiites. So, exactly how are you going to talk all of these people that hate each other and want each other dead into coming up with some kind of sustainable peace? We haven't even begun to discuss how much they all hate the Jews and the west, or the fact that they treat their women with absolutely no respect...what makes you think Hillary will be treated any better?
2007-11-29 01:53:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Mitt romney gives me the creeps, giuliani married his second cousin, hilary is too manly for me, and she just scares me. I like Obama, Ron Paul, and McCain. I'm not sure who I'll vote for, but it's probably going to be based on their character. It's politics, issues are moved around with ease, and positions are never concrete. Just look at Hilary and the war, she voted for it and now she disagrees with it. I don't care about the yellowcake lies, politicians need to learn to be accountable for their actions and not blame what they can to maintain face.
Honestly, we're too embroiled in the damn thing to just pack up and leave. I never supported the War in Iraq or Afgahnistan, and I never will, but we need to end with some stability and not leave a country that was, I feel shamed to admit this, worse off than it was. Plus Iran's puppet president has proved himself a bigger ****** than expected, a lingering bloc of hegemony in the region would be really good. Having just dictator run pakistan and backwards saudi arabia as our allies in the region is not wise at all, especially since we've alientated turkey with the armenian genocide recognition bill.
-----
If you're gonna give me a thumbs down, read the whole thing you jacka**
2007-11-29 02:02:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Agreed (they are for the most part wrong, with exception of Paul) but so are the democrats. Both Senator Clinton and Senator Obama cannot commit to withdrawing troops out of Iraq by 2013, possibly even later... Paul has a proper exit strategy outlined for Iraq, one which will have the troops home within 3-6 months. Both Clinton and Obama, voted in favor of reauthorizing the Patriot Act, Paul voted against it. Both Clinton and Obama, haven't ruled out the option of using strikes against Iran.. they also support Bush's sanctions against the country.. Paul on the other hand advocates a non-interventionist foreign policy where we handle situations with diplomacy.. Clinton and Obama, are both in favor of amnesty for illegal immigrants and higher taxes to reduce the U.S. debt.. Paul however is for stronger borders and will reduce government spending to take the burden of taxpayers
2007-11-29 11:10:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
First off i am deep rooted republican. I do like obama however on the democratic side. Problem is the war is not as bad as you and so many others put it. THE WAR has started to turn. There is one huge major thing to be completed and once that has been completed the war is pretty much over with. (religions shite and sunni) need to form goverment that is effective that is the only thing hampering the cause of action. Further more what really gets me is how liberals press for abortion right (the killing of babies many babies) yet they like to throw up the number of men killed in IRAQ
EXCUSE ME SIR HOW MANY BABIES HAS THE LIBERALS KILLED
2007-11-29 01:47:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Thomas L 3
·
5⤊
3⤋
I didn't see the debate, however most Republicans want to end the war by winning. Isn't that a novel idea? Have you been in a cave the last couple of months? We are winning. The surge is working. Even the NY Times admits it.
How do you talk peace to fanatics who want to kill you? How do you negotiate with them? What freedoms are you willing to give up so al-Quaeda will stop killing us? Perhaps you'd negotiate away things like women's and gay rights? Freedom of religion?
Can babies feel pain? Are you for real? Considering the stink most liberals make about whether lobsters feel pain when boiled, or the living conditions of chickens and cows, how can you even ask that. Apparently, liberals care more about the welfare of our feedstock then human beings. Talk about misplaced priorities.
2007-11-29 01:45:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Uncle Pennybags 7
·
7⤊
4⤋
Hillary? Didn't she vote to give approval for Bush to invade Iraq?
2007-11-29 01:54:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by John W 5
·
8⤊
3⤋