English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have watched both debates and both partys have been interesting. If you were to make a choice only in relations to this war.
#1. What party
#2. What canidate
#3. Why

2007-11-28 15:13:14 · 10 answers · asked by JustMe 3 in Politics & Government Elections

10 answers

1) Republican
2) Ron Paul
3) Because Paul is the only candidate who has endorsed a non interventionist foreign policy. When Americans are willing to wake up and realize that our foreign policy does help inspire terrorism (it is NOT the only cause but it IS a contributing factor) then we can progress as a nation. Its like Paul said we would not tolerate another nation in our land telling us how to live how can we expect another nation to tolerate us doing the same?

2007-11-28 15:21:42 · answer #1 · answered by harry 4 · 4 1

I consider my an independant but totally liberal in my thinking ( Im too young to vote, grr)
so I would choose democrat, Hilary Clinton, and because war is never the answer, especially this messed up tangle of hate Bush has gotten us stuck in and I beleive Hilary is the one who actually stand up for what she beleives in and not be swayed just because the polls are goin some other way, but still be open minded. I think out of all the candidates she is the most likely to get us out as best as possible and as fast as is needed. (which is quite fast) Shes strong and a good woman. No matter the crap people throw at her.
plus, we need a woman in the white house (as long as she is a good choice, which hilary is!)

2007-11-28 23:24:36 · answer #2 · answered by shouting is better 3 · 0 1

John McCain, he believes in the war, and since he is a vet that was captured in Vietnam he would be unlikely to continue a war that was not necessary, also, he would be very unlikely to allow the abuse of prisoners that so many people are complaining about. The man doesn't want to see torture used on anybody do you really think he wants to send people off to die for nothing? I pick him based strickly on the war. If I was anti-war, which I admit im not too far from Id take Ron Paul, he says take 'em out.

2007-11-29 00:16:21 · answer #3 · answered by scorch_22 6 · 0 1

The Iraq war is not a concern of mine..Im more interested in the war with Mexico right now..Border Security is what we need to be concerned about. NOt a bunch or cave dwelling arabs half a world away

2007-11-28 23:24:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Republican
Mike Huckabee
Because he is the only conservative running for the nomination. All the rest sound like a bunch of liberals to me. And McCain is to old and to hell bent on staying in Iraq.

2007-11-28 23:30:55 · answer #5 · answered by Small Victories 4 · 1 0

I would love to see a Republican ticket with Huckabee and Hunter!

They are tops on my candidate calculator and agree with my beliefs the best. They do NOT flip flop like the others and will LEAD!

VOTE TO KEEP AMERICA SAFE!

2007-11-29 02:28:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Republican
Hunter or Huckabee
Because they stand closest to my important issues like home school illegal immigrants abortion and same sex marriage

2007-11-29 00:54:14 · answer #7 · answered by renee70466 6 · 1 0

Dems
Hillary
Becuase as Lil' Kim said " You can keep an good B!+c# down"

2007-11-28 23:38:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

The "democrats" will help fund education so that it will be possible for high school graduates to spell words they should have learned in elementary school.

2007-11-28 23:20:11 · answer #9 · answered by David M 6 · 0 2

None of them Because they are all worthless scumbags.

2007-11-28 23:42:06 · answer #10 · answered by Tigger 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers