I watched a video and the Honda Accord Sedan 2008 beat the Toyota 'Camry' sedan 2007.
But i want to know who would win if it was the Honda Accord Sedan 2008 vs. the Toyota "Corolla" sedan 2008. ( its corolla, not camry)
And please dont pick toyota corolla as winner JUST because it uses less gas. Thanks for replies.
2007-11-28 14:16:15 · 7 answers · asked by HUSKY 1 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Car Makes ➔ Honda
Also give me the answer, not your opinion. I want to know which one IS better, not just in your opinion.
2007-11-28 14:17:06 · update #1
Also give me the answer, not your opinion. I want to know which one IS better, not just in your opinion cause you like it better.
2007-11-28 14:17:18 · update #2
Also give me the answer, not your opinion. I want to know which one IS better, not just in your opinion cause you like one better.
2007-11-28 14:17:26 · update #3
Fine, can i compare Honda Accord sedan 2008 to the Toyota Civic 2008 sedan.
2007-11-28 14:34:36 · update #4
oh sorry. silly me. theres no such thing as toyota civic. Watever then. hah.
2007-11-28 14:36:27 · update #5
okay, this isnt a really good comparison, an accord would compare with a camry but anyways......
1) the corolla comes with only a option of the1.8l 4cyl engine while you have the option of the 2.4l 4cyl engine and a 3.5l 6cyl engine in a accord.
2)the price is a huge difference, the MRSP for the corolla LE is about $16,000 and the MRSP for the accord EX $25,000
3)the gas isnt that much different the corolla gets 26/35 (city/highway) and the accord gets 21/31
i mean overall the cars are totally different so if you need a bigger sedan you are better off getting the accord
in my opinion i would definitely have to say the accord is better!
2007-11-28 14:47:22 · answer #1 · answered by Mohaman 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What do you mean by "win"? Speed? Roominess? Cost of Ownership? Depends on what you want.
As other posters have mentioned, the Corolla and the Accord are two cars that are in different classes. They're both pretty well built, but serving different needs.
If you want roominess, more cargo space, creature comforts, smoother acceleration and ride, go with the Accord, as it is a larger car (and equivalent to the Corolla's bigger brother, the Camry).
The Corolla is more economical on fuel, easier to park due to its smaller dimensions, and less expensive to maintain and fix overall.
They're both winners as far as sound cars - they've historically had good reliability and decent resale value. The only question is which car is better for your needs.
2007-11-29 18:43:36 · answer #2 · answered by Silverkris 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honda Accord
2007-11-28 22:23:30 · answer #3 · answered by Slim 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are not comparing two comparable vehicles. The Accord is comparable to the Camry, not to the Corolla. Obviously the Accord is going to 'win', simply because it's a larger car, offers more amenities, better ride and costs about $8-9K more than does a Corolla.
The Corolla is also a very fine car IN ITS CLASS. It's just smaller than the Accord and offers less, since it COSTS a lot less.
Why on earth are you trying to compare two unsimilar automobiles ?
2007-11-28 22:31:02 · answer #4 · answered by acermill 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Corolla has 138HP and the Accord has 177HP. The Accord would definately win. The Corolla was not built for any kind of speed. That is why they were never used as tuner cars.
2007-11-28 23:28:59 · answer #5 · answered by C7S 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Honda Accord all the way
2007-11-30 15:11:15 · answer #6 · answered by jo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
my husband drives many cars (as rentals) he just drove a Corolla..he said it was a nasty little cheap car...(his words, not mine...)
I'd go for the Accord, reliability, bigger engine, better tires, better interior...
2007-11-28 23:17:50 · answer #7 · answered by Chrys 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋