is it justified when u do it to feed ur starving family?? even if u shoot the clerk or anyone in the process? like lets say u rob 7-11, steal lots of chips and food and money and the clerk pulls out his shotgun, then u shoot him? is it legally/morally justified when u do it for survival and food?
2007-11-28 13:31:58 · 6 answers · asked by thefirstamerican 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Only if your OJ.
2007-11-28 13:39:09 · answer #1 · answered by apple juice 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Armed robbery is NEVER justified! There are too many non profit organizations to help people in need! Churches, food pantries, etc. Even DHS will give out a food voucher for someone in need of food! So, if you are in need, contact your local DHS, they can steer you in the direction of a place in your area that gives free food!
If your that desperate and you have a gun, sell the damn thing and buy some food! There are plenty of pawn shops you can take it to!
2007-11-28 13:42:18 · answer #2 · answered by onlyme 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not when there are churches and food stamps. But you must be Liberal because it's all about you and screw the other mans family they don't need a person who unlike you has a job and supports his family the right way.
2007-11-28 13:38:03 · answer #3 · answered by LIL_TXN 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No because the clerk's life is as important as your own or that of your family. Please don't do it man. If you are capable of robbing a store you are capable of working.
2007-11-28 13:36:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, it is not justified. It is even worse to actually murder someone defending themself against your threat.
YOU ARE THE THREAT!!!!!
2007-11-28 20:44:13 · answer #5 · answered by Gray Wanderer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um, no, absolutely not, even if you didn't hurt anyone.
2007-11-28 13:39:11 · answer #6 · answered by theseeker4 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋