WWE and TNA's Pros and Cons?

Question

What are some points in which WWE exels (ex.Many Houshold names) and what are some points in which they need to be improved(ex. Bad Creative Department). What is good about TNA (ex.real promos), and what are some problems they have (Pushing wrong people) Try to list more than one and add details.

Answer 1

WWE:
Pros-
*They have a history and have been around for a long time
*Loads of talent (don't use it well though..I'll get to that in the Cons though..)
*When people think of Pro-wrestling, they think WWE
*Lots of money, worldwide company

Cons-
*Horrible storylines
*Push the wrong people all the time. They have so much talent, yet continue to push crappy wrestlers. (ex. HHH getting pushed to the moon, while many wrestlers are forced to job to him).
*The fact that the WWE basically is targeting children more than their mature fans.
*They have more talking and less wrestling on shows.
*Bad press since the Benoit tragedy.

TNA-
Pros:
*Lots of talent
*Better women's division than the WWE.
*More matches than promos
*Better promo's, they sound less rehearsed than WWE ones
*The fact that most of their roster works smaller indy shows too, which is cool.
*TNA Today on Youtube Lol! I love that show...

Cons:
*Keeping around pointless/old people that have no worth.
*They don't travel around.
*Less known than the WWE, less money.
*Pushing the wrong people, not using the X-Division as much as they should.

Answer 2

WWE Pros:
Famous
Lots Of Money
Good Wrestlers
A good history in the past
Have some good championships
Known Worldwide

WWE Cons:
Push the wrong wrestlers at the wrong time
Use overrated wrestlers
Bad storylines
Mediocre promos.
Bad ratings.
Vince is a terrible chairman now.

TNA Pros:
Have what WWE doesn't have like Angle, Sting etc.
Have good wrestlers
Uses more matches than promos.
They got Booker T
They have a better woman's division

TNA Cons:
Barely use the X-division to its full potential
Not so famous
Less money

Not very famous

Answer 3

TNA

Good Points

More exciting matches - high flying, athletic moves, more aggressive and dangerous (e.g. exciting).
Sometimes it feels like it tries harder to please the fans.

Better wrestlers - I'd say TNA had more talent, if you look past a few hasbeen's, though wwe can be guilty of this at times.

Rawness - Smaller promotions have a certain quality, of the feeling that anything can happen, it doesnt feel quite as "manufactured" as WWE, its less of a "brand", and more of a "wrestling" show, with the emphasis on wrestling. Though I see this as an "advantage" and a "disadvantage", as you'll see below.

Bad points -

Product lacks polish - Some people may be put off that it doesnt look as proffesional as wwe, and perhaps doesnt have the same charisma as people like MVP. Sometimes the show seems less important than WWE despite having some better matches.

Lacks personality - I struggle to connect with the characters, there personalities and gimmicks can feel bland. I sometimes feel indifferent towards who wins.



WWE

Good points -

Sylish and proffesional - Some stars ooze good looks and charisma, though not all. All nicely packaged with decent commentators, huge ppv's e.g. wrestlemania, a good sense of humour, and an entertaining chairman.

History - The company has a long interesting history and big fan base, I think it adds to the experience at times, I tend to take WWE more seriously. Many people grew up watching wwe, theres a certain connection among the fans, nostalgia etc.

Bad points -

Softer matches - Due to injury risks, the matches are more tame now e.g. hardcore title matches are gone.

Arragance - Since having no real competition, it can feel like they dont try as hard. Also, too many matches get interupted by DQ, A bit of a cope out.

Answer 4

WWE Pros



WWE Cons
All the good wrestlers are on heat and Ok/Bad Wrestlers get pushed
Non Finishes in major PPV bouts
Smackdown right now except MVP/Hardy and occasional Taker appearence
The way they treat the Cruiserweight title
Tag Team Division
Brand Extension


TNA Pros
Talent
Creativity (King of the Mountain, six side, Ultimate X etc)


Cons
Bad Booking (Pacman title, Roode-Joe, Title change on Impact after BFG, Too many Gimmick matches (russo), Too many gauntlets)
Not pushing Harris, Daniels, Low Ki, Petey Williams
Too many people on roster
Not making up their mind (Stamboli's name, Knockout/Womens title)

Answer 5

WWE experts: larger fanbase, better gimmicks, better commentators, better promos, better humor, better journey varieties, better Championships, better wrestlers, wonderful, NXT, Chris Jericho, side, CM Punk, Daniel Bryan, John Morrison, Triple H etc etc. WWE Cons: No blood (TNA overdoes it even if the WWE must have a touch blood to make it extra sensible), no longer sufficient belts, undesirable tag branch, undesirable divas branch, no cruiserweight branch, Hornswoggle. TNA experts: AJ varieties, Desmonde Wolfe and Kurt perspective, solid Knockouts branch. TNA Cons: Hulk Hogan, Eric Bischoff, Botches, overdoing of swearing and blood, second fee version of WCW, undesirable wrestling, undesirable gimmicks, undesirable attires, no well-being coverage, undesirable treatment of stars, no longer sufficient belts, X branch sucks, too huge a roster, undesirable commentators, tiny fanbase, dont care about what the followers opt for, undesirable promos etc etc. BQ: SVR O8. i love the hot controls.

Answer 6

WWE's Pros:
Better overall roster.
Often has better wrestling.
Far better mic workers.
The company to be in for most US workers, which means the cream of the crop will aspire to be here.
Loads of legends are available for use.

WWE's Cons:
Below average creative team.
RAW's a wreck.
Often misuses or pushes wrestlers too early.
Their "entertainment" lacks anything entertaining at times.
Often pushes useless wrestlers.
Fans who criticize anything that isn't the Attitude Era.

TNA's Pros:
Solid wrestling.
Far better group of young wrestlers.
Their women and tag team divisions are much better.
The company overall has a huge upside and big potential.
They have Samoa Joe. 'Nuff said.

TNA's Cons:
Horrendous pushes to undeserving wrestlers.
Abysmal writing team.
A lack of young main event talent that has been pushed right.
Except for PPVs, don't travel around the country.
Full of rabid TNA marks.

Answer 7

TNA Gimmicks are dumm you couldn't tell if they really have gimmick all they have is there music

take Black machessemoe he is just a guy dress up like in Rain bows colors

they have no point to the gimmicks




WWE

Has really good gimmicks they have music to go along with there gimmicks tna doesn't give them music to go along wit them like Kurt angle his music doent even make scene

it doesn fit his Gimicks

Answer 8

I'm surprised nobody has said Cena for WWE cons yet...

Answer 9

wwe
pros - all the stars
cons - all the crack heads as writers

tna
pros - good matches
cons - not so good ratings(i dont know why)

Answer 10

WWE pros-Everything

tna cons-Everything