English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please do not answer based on who you like better. Anyway, who's speed is more impressive for their size. I notice just at by hearing the weight of these 2 individuals, you wouldn't expect them to run and move the way they do. Particularly going back to when Undertaker was 328 pounds and moved similarly to how he does today at 300 pounds and Umaga and the way he moves at an obese size

2007-11-28 09:47:41 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

15 answers

taker you see him jumping over the ropes in matches like Wm23 um about the speed i dk but you could say he is fast for weight and age

2007-11-28 10:05:51 · answer #1 · answered by AceFireStar 3 · 1 1

Umaga

2007-11-29 08:22:21 · answer #2 · answered by Mr.Shayan, 4 · 0 0

Undertaker, I mean did you ever se him fly a Wrestlemania!?! At WM22 he jumped over the top rope, (from the mat not the turnbuckle) cleared the casket, and hit Mark Henrey about 3-5 away form the casket! Now let's see Umaga try to do that with out falling flat on his face! HA!

2007-11-28 18:06:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Taker is my man, But Umaga is young and fast!!! but Overall, don't even compare Umaga to Undertaker.

2007-11-28 17:54:05 · answer #4 · answered by julian192001 3 · 2 1

Taker. Not only is he pretty damn fast, but he can do an array of aerial moves. Umaga might be able to do one or two.

And let's not forget the age difference.

2007-11-28 18:28:56 · answer #5 · answered by Ash 5 · 0 0

Umaga is huge and he can really jump and kick people in the face so it's got to be UMAGA.

2007-11-28 17:52:11 · answer #6 · answered by stonecoldstl 2 · 1 1

Umaga weighs more and he can pull off some pretty good kicks.

2007-11-28 17:51:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

taker. Since when has umaga been impressive at all?

2007-11-28 17:56:49 · answer #8 · answered by BOB 6 · 0 0

definetely umaga - not only is he huge but he is quick - he can run fast and do really great moves - undertaker has some great moves but he is not as quick

2007-11-28 17:51:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I'd have to go with Umaga. He's quicker.

2007-11-28 17:52:25 · answer #10 · answered by ron-D 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers