English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Shouldn't a candidate for President avail themselves to all reasonable inquiries?http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/07/453457.aspx

Are the only allowable questions we can ask Hillary ones that have been pre-planted by Clinton campaign staffers?
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/13/clinton.planted/index.html?eref=ib_topstories

2007-11-28 08:45:12 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

When asked if she would be disappointed if she is not the winner. She replied, "Oh, it will be ME!"

She is sooo arrogant, that she would never apologize for anything. Did she ever apologize for lying about Bill's affairs? Did she apologize to the women Bill raped? Has she ever accepted resposibility for anything?

Exactly my point. So why would she apologize for something that is so trivial in her selfish eyes?

.

2007-11-28 23:12:15 · answer #1 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 2 1

To the guy who says that this is a state issue-you are right, but only to a degree. The federal government has the obligation to regulate interstate commerce, and also to control immigration.
Since this is an area which involves both of these issues, it is also one of those thorny issues which requires cooperation between states and the federal government.
Therefore, I believe that it is an appropriate question.
While the feds cannot dictate to the individual states on their requirements for a drivers license, they can mandate that you must be a citizen, or at least here legally. This would fall under controlling immigration.
If a CDL is requested, the federal government has a great deal to say, and all of it is within their stated responsibilities. This would fall under regulating interstate commerce.

2007-11-28 23:38:18 · answer #2 · answered by maryjellerson 4 · 3 0

Probably because the majority of the people that are dead set against amnesty for illegals will not accept any answer she provides, nor will they listen to the logic behind the decision to implement the policy. Now, I don't like Hillary at all, but not for one second do I believe she just wants to sell out America to illegals. The situation is more complicated than that.

2007-11-29 01:45:44 · answer #3 · answered by Pfo 7 · 1 1

She has learned a little trick from Bill, ha! ...it depends on what "is" means...
....same sh*t different question, depends on who she wants to vote for her...
Must be a real Crisis:
....do I say No and have the 80% polled that don't want driver license for illegals.

...or do I say Yes and get the 20% who are here illegal that I can get "fake" votes to change the voting results....
...Must be a real brainer for her!

...as far as planted question...it reminds me of the old movies where they have a recorded clapping for live TV...she has several recordings of praise...I am sure!

2007-11-28 11:02:48 · answer #4 · answered by Rada S 5 · 3 1

It's all part of her strategy. The more people get to know Hillary and how she stands on the issues the less likely they are to vote for her.

2007-11-29 01:52:43 · answer #5 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 2 0

It's a state issue, and was handled by the Governor of NY state. It was not an issue a Presidential candidate SHOULD speak on.
Or have conservatives all of a sudden dropped "States Rights" in favor of a federal drivers license?
Can we call the press on that ? Hey voters - CONSERVATIVES want FEDERAL DRIVERS LICENSES !!!

2007-11-28 08:53:04 · answer #6 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 3 2

She did give us an answer. Well, actually a bunch of them. Take your pick on which you like, there's one in the list that'll suite you no matter what you believe.

2007-11-29 02:47:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You have it backwards darling. Hillary 'does not owe' America anything. America OWES Hillary. Or at least that is how the hag herself sees it. Hillary believes she is entitled to the presidency-she owes no explainations that could cost her the election.

2007-11-28 11:59:57 · answer #8 · answered by Cherie 6 · 2 2

Good points as usually Deadmarxist.



wow, lib using a Federalist arguement??

2007-11-28 08:51:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Ok, she no Margret Thatcher, no Queen Elizabeth, but shes a woman dammit, and we are overdue for a woman president so any nag will do.

2007-11-28 08:57:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers