English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

He chose a non-partisan group of democrats. The republicans felt shunned & refused to ratify the treaty.

2007-11-28 08:23:46 · answer #1 · answered by IamCount 4 · 0 0

He totally shunned the Republican Party in the peace negotiations and he would need some of their votes to pass the League of Nations charter in the Senate and so he should have appeased some of them but he was relatively stubborn which would prove costly .

2007-11-28 09:42:38 · answer #2 · answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7 · 0 0

He thoroughly saved faraway from the Republican celebration indoors the peace negotiations and he could go with a variety of their votes to bypass the League of world places structure indoors the Senate and so he might desire to have appeased dissimilar them yet he replace into particularly stubborn which will trainer high priced .

2016-10-18 07:15:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers