Are women brainwashed to believe they are only good for Playboy and making babies?

Question

Seems like many women(even men) are catty towards each other and cannot accept females as authority figures.
Cause if that wasnt the case there would have been at LEAST 1 woman President in America since the year America, land of the free and equal was born.

Over 200 years of "free and equal" and no woman President yet? hmmmmmmmmmmmm interesting. And for those who are slow and will point out that women havent had the right to vote until recently...........THAT's my point. It isnt free and equal then is it?????

Where did I mention Hillary in my question?

Answer 1

If you're talking about Hillary, she's neither fit for the presidency, nor for Playboy.

And it's not because she's a woman that she isn't fit for the presidency; it's because she's Hillary!

Vote for Rudy!

Answer 2

When a woman runs who I think has a platform and the ability to run this country then I will vote for her. Hillary ain't got it sweetheart. She has nothing that I consider useful to this country to offer.

I am a highly educated woman - and a free thinker. I do not identify myself by who I am married to and how he can help my career. I've made babies (which renders the playboy lay out pretty much a moot point) and I have also been very sucessful in my career.

The "catty" person here seems to be you because you insist that the only way a woman can measure up in your book would be to vote for a woman presidential candidate even if we don't agree with her platform. Wouldn't that makes us brainwashed into thinking a vagina creates some kind of automatic vote from others with vagina's?

No thanks - I vote based on my brain - not my genitalia.

Answer 3

OK now list HER accomplishments (not committees she has sat through) and tell me why OTHER then she is a woman that you support her...

Don't say she was a jr senator of NY cuz she did absolutely nothing but used that as her 8 year steps to become president, and lets not claim being the presidents arm candy is one either because everything she attempted to do was a complete failure..

So why would you support her? She is woman??? Pretty silly...

You didn't have to mention Hillary in your question.. It was pretty obvious your meaning behind your question. Also your user name sure suggests it. When you wanna make a statement you can't just blindly make a statement and hope no one gets your true intentions. That's exactly what Hillary does.

Answer 4

I think you are missing the point entirely. This is a religious question, not a law and ethics question. Men and women are different, physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually. That is undeniable. We don't think or feel the same about life and the challenges we face therein.
The man's primary function has always been to provide, protect and preside over his family and by extension, the community. He leads by a good example and hard work.
The woman's primary function has always been to support her husband, bring in the next generation, nurture them and train them into being good adults and to develop her own skills and abilities to assist in the enrichment of her family and her community.
The consignment of women to playthings or baby factories is an abuse of her talents and abilities. She is beside the man, not behind him, nor ahead of him. It is the wickedness of men that has convinced many women that they are only good for men's pleasure. A woman's life should be full of richness and achievement. Her childbearing years are only a part of her life. There is much to live for after the child rearing years are over. If a woman desires to share her knowledge and ability in community leadership, that is fine. She then stands on the same ground as any other candidate. If her ideas are reasonable, then people will support her. If not, then she will not garner many votes.

Answer 5

How well do you know your history?

Unfortunately, women didn't even have the right to vote until the 1920s. Doesn't have a danged thing to do if we were brainwashed or not. Social change happens but not on your timeline. Being catty has nothing at all to do with it. Being smart and knowing what you want has a lot to do with success.

As for Hillary, give me a break. She's only running on her husband's coattails, and only remained married to him because of her political ambitions and has made a number of enemies. Let's talk about how many people she's ticked off with her racial or religious snide comments like the Jewish population in New York or mimicking blacks. She's clueless in my book. There are a lot of other women out there who have made their mark on history...Lynn Cheney, Condoleeza Rice, and many others who haven't even been political. Let's talk women who've made advances...how many men have won two Nobel prizes? I can think of a woman: Marie Curie.

Answer 6

No! What are we supposed to vote for a women to be President just because she is a women? How about having one run that is quilified for the job then perhaps we would get a women President. I actually think more men would vote for a qualified women then actually would women.

Just like other women were the biggest group against women having the vote

Answer 7

U shldnt vote for Hilliary just because she is a woman, u shld vote for someone who is more qualified.
Wut if she turns out to be a worse president the her predecessors?
Wud u risk your economy and your country just because u want the first woman president?
At the end of the day u shld vote 4 a more qualified president not for equality....thats just nonsense

Answer 8

Notice how the term is "All men are created equal?"

Even in the founding fathers' time, there were slaves and inentured servants. They were not considered equals.

It was only in the 1970's that equal opportunities for women were created.

Prior to that time, most married women were housewives, and women only made a fraction of what a man made working the same job. Women bosses were unheard of.

Now is the time that America may be ready for its first woman president.

Answer 9

my my, now you sound just like the witch! being a female only gives you privileges in the sack assuming you fit the qualifications! I have not seen one woman other than Maggie Thatcher that would qualify.Hillary(the witch) is a socialist/commie that should have been busted and in jail way back.show me an American smart woman with a set of balls. Ann Coulter anyone ?

Answer 10

I'd have to disagree with the sentiment that not having a female president yet makes us bigots. Isn't it entirely possible that people didn't agree with their platforms?

Before you accuse me of not voting for Hillary because I'm a male chauvanistic pig, that's anything but the case. I refuse to vote for her because I don't agree with her views and her past has revealed her for the crook that she is.

If we stop thinking of people as categories (such as genders, ethnicities, sexual orientations, and religions) much of the problem will be solved. But we have to lead by example. Hillary shouldn't say factionalizing statements such as "Woman should vote for me because I'm a woman like them" and Obama's wife shouldn't say "Blacks should vote for my husband because he understands them better than anyone else running". It's just as bigoted as discrimination.

You can't fight segregation with segregation.

If a woman ran with a platform that I agreed with, I would definetelly vote for her.

Edit: You didn't mention Hillary. But I've seen your other questions, quite pro Hillary or a means to cut someone else down to Hillary's level. And, you know, your user name and all.

Do you think we'd be having this discussion if Hillary wasn't running, or if you didn't feel so strongly about her?